English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i dont know why they gave her an id change...the ***** should burn in hell.

2006-07-14 09:17:02 · 11 answers · asked by carl_nozza 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

11 answers

there is a court order preventing public disclosure of specific details.

i dont think she was punished enough for what she did though. she gave huntley the opportunity to dispose of evidence and prevent the police forensics from proving what he did.

he murdered two beautiful children and she covered his back.

2006-07-14 09:23:16 · answer #1 · answered by 'Dr Greene' 7 · 1 0

According to a Mail on Sunday article on 2/nov/14, Maxine Carr, Baby P's mother Tracey Connelly and kidnapper Karen Matthews are all said to be living in the same seaside town. This is likely to be true. Skegness for example has many pedo's quietly relocated there

2016-03-27 05:30:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I understand your hatred of Carr - she is despicable and was proven to be a liar in court.

Carr will never in reality have a life where she can truly confide or be honest to other people for the rest of her life, and given her personality she will undoubtedly bring about her own downfall in any new identity she has been provided.

Personally, I don't think this forum is a suitable place to guess or wrongly point fingers at potentially innocent people.

2006-07-14 09:26:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Have you people been drinking? Minor crime? Innocent? She committed perjury, providing a flase alibi to a scumbag who had murdered two ten year old girls! She should have got ten years minimum.

Think about this - if someone asks you for a phoney alibi, what is your first thought? I defy anyone to say anything except - "They did it." Why does anyone need a phoney alibi? Why won't the real one do? If she had a molecule of decency and honesty in her scrawny frame she would have gone straight to the police and told them Huntley had asked her for a false alibi.

Mind you, the woman obviously has the intelligence of a cheese sandwich. At the time she said she was with Huntley - while he was murdering those poor, doomed little girls - she was in a pub miles away, raising hell with a group of people , one of whom videotaped the whole thing! How on earth did she think she would get away with it?

2006-07-14 10:08:00 · answer #4 · answered by drrwalker2003 3 · 0 0

Maxine Carr commited a minor crime: that of giving her murdering husband a false alibi.
I suspect that a fair proportion of married couples would be inclined to do the same if the partner they loved commited a crime .. though they may later reconsider as they started to see past emotion to the sense of reality. She may also have been worried that her husband would implicate her if she didn't give him an alibi.
Put yourself in her shoes. She's served her sentence for her relatively minor crime, so leave her alone.

2006-07-14 09:21:48 · answer #5 · answered by Quasimojo 3 · 0 0

I really do not agree with you. She was only guilty of loving someone and she had paid a terrible price for that love.

She had paid a debt to society, so let her be. I hope she finds some happiness.

2006-07-14 09:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by peewit 3 · 0 0

It is not up to us to question the courts decision no matter whether we think it right or wrong.

2006-07-14 10:09:56 · answer #7 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 0 0

A little while ago she was believed to be in Scarborough.

2006-07-15 05:50:08 · answer #8 · answered by geoff t 4 · 0 0

if i knew i would shoot her and no she is not living near me the *****

2006-07-14 09:21:10 · answer #9 · answered by womam12 5 · 0 0

who is maxine carr............neva heard of her...what did her husband do?

2006-07-14 10:21:02 · answer #10 · answered by purrrrrrrfect 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers