English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who are the terrorists here?

2006-07-14 09:13:56 · 10 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government Politics

BEFORE THE LIBS GO NUTS HERE I MEANT TO SAY TARGETS I FORGOT TO HIT SPELL CHECK AGAIN SO JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION I FOUND MY OWN ERROR OOPS.

2006-07-14 09:17:27 · update #1

10 answers

come on ppl!!!
why did hezbullah take the soldiers?!?!?! don't just go & repeat ur leaders' words without knowing nothing:S:S:S:S
the 2 soldiers r taken because there r ppl in the israeli prisons like samir alqintar for TWENTY EIGHT years!!!! 28 years of torture (u saw a sample in iraq) pain & awful treatment...
go search & check the treatment of hezbullah to the ppl they captured (they r very few)...and when u find out...u will know who is the terrorist...
hezbullah took the soldiers to force israel to release him & other prisoners.....

2006-07-16 03:20:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why do you pick on the libs. Their not the word nazis the neocons are. Now to your question. Israel is defending itself. It needs to do so as it is being attacked from both sides. I think that the Israelis have the right idea. Go after all the terrorists. Get them before they do too much harm. We should have sent the Israelis after Osama. I bet he'd be in jail by now. By the way I'm a lib.

2006-07-14 16:55:05 · answer #2 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

israel is killed at least 20 civilians. hezbollah targets occupiers. if they kill the wrong ones they can call it collateral damage, just like israel does.

No More Tears: Benny Morris and the Road Back from Liberal Zionism

Joel Beinin

(Joel Beinin, an editor of this magazine, teaches Middle East history at Stanford University.)

Books Reviewed

Benny Morris, 1948 and After: Israel and the Palestinians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, second edition, 1994).

Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).



Haganah militiamen expel Palestinian Arabs from Haifa, April 1948. (Agence France Presse)

On July 11, 1948, Aharon Cohen, director of the Arab Affairs Department of the socialist-Zionist Mapam party in Israel, received a carbon copy of a military intelligence report. Israel, a state less than two months old, was embroiled in a war with neighboring Arab states that would last until 1949. The document in Cohen’s hands analyzed the reasons for the flight of 240,000 Palestinian Arabs from areas which had been allocated to the Jewish state by the November 1947 UN partition plan and another 150,000 from the Jerusalem region and areas allocated to the Arab state. Cohen was upset to read the report’s conclusion that 70 percent of these Arabs had fled due to “direct, hostile Jewish operations against Arab settlements” by Zionist militias, or the “effect of our hostile operations on nearby (Arab) settlements.”[1] One month before Cohen received this report, Mapam’s political committee had issued a resolution opposing “the tendency to expel the Arabs from the Jewish state,” in response to Cohen’s warnings that such operations were taking place.

Over the course of Arab-Jewish fighting between 1947 and 1949, well over 700,000 Palestinians were made refugees, the majority of them by direct expulsion or the fear of expulsion or massacre. The largest single expulsion occurred after Israeli conquest of the towns of Lydda and Ramla in the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv corridor during July 9-18, 1948. Some 50,000 Palestinians were driven out of their homes in these towns by Israeli forces whose deputy commander was Yitzhak Rabin, prime minister of Israel from 1974-1977 and 1992-1995. Some two dozen massacres of Palestinians were perpetrated by pre-state Zionist militias and Israeli forces, the most infamous of them on April 9-10, 1948, at the village of Deir Yassin.

2006-07-14 16:16:46 · answer #3 · answered by soperson 4 · 0 0

Are you Jewish? Or do you have business interests in Israel? I don't see any reason for the US to stick up for Israel.

Attacking civilian targets is usually a terrorist tactic and both sides have done that.

2006-07-14 16:20:37 · answer #4 · answered by The_Dark_Knight 4 · 0 0

this is not about terrorists. what happened was two military soldiers were taken hostage from israel and they are retalliating. I think that it has a lot more to do with all the tensions in that region more than anything but thats the story we get from the news. its a powder keg right now WWIII could be in the makings.

2006-07-14 16:18:55 · answer #5 · answered by dcj2404 2 · 0 0

First of all its Hezbollah, not Hisbollah. secondly, everone knows Hezbollah is a terrorist group and Israel is an independent state. Israel have the right to defend its borders against insurgents and terrorist groups like those of Hamas and Ben Ladden.

Hezbollah is the terrorist, not Israel

2006-07-14 16:21:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i am not a lib but i support Israel and Bush won't let Israel lose

2006-07-14 16:42:55 · answer #7 · answered by Elizabeth 6 · 0 0

the party of god.....doing all this in the name of their religion.
Hezbollah are the terrorists. backed by Syria and Iran

2006-07-14 16:17:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The ones (like you that can't spell).

2006-07-14 16:16:53 · answer #9 · answered by somebody else 3 · 0 0

they Both are

2006-07-14 16:16:26 · answer #10 · answered by Joe 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers