Would you vote for him? Do you think he could reverse the negative effects of the Bush Regime?
2006-07-14 07:59:47 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
To answer, it will take somebody as good as Clinton was to straighten out the horrible mess that this country is in. Just a normal Joe run of the mill person will not be able to. They are going to need the cooperation of congress so it is very important for the democrats to take back congress too. Yes I would vote for Clinton again. He is the best president at the business of running the country that I have seen in my 60 years.
2006-07-14 08:18:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What does it matter? The only good thing it would bring would be support for the war in Iraq from the left. The Clinton loyalest would follow Clinton (or any other Lefty) and actually support the war effort for a change. Kerry could then actually vote for the war again after voting against it after voting for it? I think that's right. Bush could win again too. The liberals would disagree but have been wrong twice (on this) already.
2006-07-14 08:20:59 · answer #2 · answered by Rich E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton wouldn't stand a snowballs chance in hell of winning dog catcher, let alone president.
In his final year in office, the economy was free falling, and all slick willie could do was campaign and raise money for the democrats.
Most of the negative effects you talk about are things that dirt bag Clinton left undone. Bush has been cleaning up his mess since he's been in office. Read a book or two about the Clinton White House, I'm sure even a dip stick like you can figure out how useless he really was (is).
2006-07-14 08:07:44 · answer #3 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Even if he could run again, he would never even get the party nomination because all of the dirt that came out about his dealing with Whitewater and during the impeachment hearings. The Clinton's were not very good people and their careers have been surrounded by quite a number of unexplained disappearances and "suicides". Too many of their past dealing would be uncovered this time. That is why Hillary won't get the nod, well that and she is a woman, and she is irrevocably linked to the federal HMO debacle.
Remember, since 1998 its been Hillary, and not Bill who has been invited to support candidates running for office. Bill Clinton is political poison.
2006-07-14 08:08:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sigh, the Bush Regime as you put it is not as bad as "all the negative effects" you speak of. Almost all politicans are corrupt in some way. Clinton was just as bad as Bush. He had Osama handed to him by anotyher country, but turned him down. He got us involved in 2 separate wars (which aren't any better than Iraq is right now either) He added so many regulatory laws and gave the enviornmentals so much power that it hurt us economically down the road (like now) Clinton caved to North Korea's demands which makes them such a threat today. He really messed up the middle east by giving them a false sense of peace because he didn't solve any of the problems that were causing anyhting. Clinton is just as inefffective as Bush and yes we'd be as worse off now if he was in office.
2006-07-14 08:05:35 · answer #5 · answered by spockofvullcan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He can not run Coloryst, however, YES, he'd win. Remember the good days in the 90's? Seems like ancient history, but it happened. Bill and Hil' worked like a team, Hil' can run, Bill will be a strong influence politically. Things can be OK again if people get out to vote. That way, we will not be run over by these oil-mongers.
2006-07-16 04:45:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for him, however...Clinton's strong point was not foreign policy, it was domestic issues. Clinton could clean up the issues we have here at home, but may not be good at solving Iraq. Of course, I don't know who could screw anything up worse than Bush. My dog could run the country better. Would Clinton win? I have a feeling he would.
2006-07-14 08:05:00 · answer #7 · answered by crazymomma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would he win not will he win. Unfortunately, he probably would but I did not vote for him then and would not now. We need a president who can set his ego and personal agenda aside and have the best interest of the country and ALL Americans at heart. However, since everyone who gets to that level seems to be a crooked thief and liar I guess will are SOL.
2006-07-14 08:06:51 · answer #8 · answered by tcb396 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I rather have a non-moral president and GREAT economy, than someone with morals that is taking us to a depression!!!!!
YES I WILL VOTE FOR BILL CLINTON
2006-07-14 08:08:28 · answer #9 · answered by RICARDO M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-- the moral majority seems to be in control of the country. Bill Clinton is anything but moral.
2006-07-14 08:03:18 · answer #10 · answered by celia a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋