this program allows mothers to buy food and meet nutritional needs of there infants and children.
2006-07-14 07:07:28 · 6 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bush only increases funding for war.
2006-07-14 07:09:07 · update #1
yeah that is a good one, Bush is a ****************************************************************
2006-07-14 07:10:56 · answer #1 · answered by latina lover 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"bush only increase funding for war" is totally false; Bush increased funding for AIDs research, for AIDs assistance to Africa, for education in the United States and Homeland security. I'm curious what good does it to spend more on social programs (WIC) if you don't have a country left? I think the increased spending on Homeland Security has been long (8 years at least) over due. Too bad some presidents played with Interns while the worlds extremist plotted against us.
2006-07-14 14:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by netjr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So instead of lowering taxes, so families can keep their money and buy food, he decided to steal more of other people's money to give to them. No really, that sounds great. Why go to the Red Cross, United Way, Salvation Army, or any of the thousands of charities out there, when you can just have Slick Willy steal money and give it to you?
2006-07-14 14:20:56 · answer #3 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
big deal...all Democrats increase spending on social programs...the belief that all things important should be handed to people, sending the message that it is okay not to work hard, or educate yourself.
2006-07-14 14:25:05 · answer #4 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can believe that Clinton would help women, that's his thing.
2006-07-14 14:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ding, Ding, Ding, Hello? You Should not be having babies if you cant support them. F*** women who are on welfare!!!!
2006-07-14 14:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋