English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I essentially use my system for encoding DVDs, converting mpg and avi. Ripping DVDs, etc... I notice it takes probably about an hour to encode a dvd right now I'm running a 1700+ I was planning to purchase a 3000 XP with the 333 FSB I was thinking it may speed things up a little bit. I notice the difference between the two chips is a double in the L1 and L2 cache from 64 to 128 in L1 and 256 to 512 in L2. Speed goes from 1.47 in the 1700+ to 2.167 in the 3000. I have a Radeon 9800 PRO and 2 WD 250GB hard drives and 1.5 gig of PC2100 RAM

2006-07-14 06:57:17 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Hardware Add-ons

2 answers

yes you'll see the difference man, 1700+ is an older processor and 3000+ is newer and its supports 64bit processing, its cheaper than the new dual-cores but it will speed up your encoding time. you definitely should upgrade!

2006-07-14 08:06:41 · answer #1 · answered by » pōпб§±ë® ¬ 4 · 0 0

yes you will see a difference. my old 2ghz pc with 1 gig ram took about 35 mins from start to finish on a dvd.

my new pentium d 930 dual core 3 ghz pc with 1 gig of ram takes about 15 mins from start to finish on a dvd.

Some dvds take longer that others depending on the content of the dvd

2006-07-14 14:01:36 · answer #2 · answered by AnswerGuy 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers