English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The 2007 Major League Baseball All Star Game is going to be held at a National League Ballpark at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA (with the San Francisco Giants being the host team) and two National League Ballparks in a row. The MLB All Star Game has a National League host the game on even years and the Americal League host the All Star Game on odd years but since 2007 is an odd year and the All Star Game is not being held by an American League team, do you think the American League should automatically be the host team for the 2007 MLB World Series?

2006-07-14 05:26:46 · 11 answers · asked by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 in Sports Baseball

11 answers

I dont think the all-star game she be the determining factor in deciding home field for the World Series. I think how it goes in other sports where the team with the best record get home field. The way it goes now does make the all star game much more meaningful but it still doesnt really seem fare. If the mets were to make it and say so did oakland. The A's shouldnt get home field when no one on their team had much to do with the AL win. The team with the best record get it.

2006-07-14 05:47:39 · answer #1 · answered by drunkbomber 5 · 7 1

Home field advantage for the 2007 World Series should go to the league that wins the 2007 All-Star game at AT&T Park in San Francisco.

2006-07-14 06:01:27 · answer #2 · answered by Hawkeye 3 · 0 0

Going against my feelings that the All-Star Game should not have ANY effects on the rest of the season and/or postseason, should it really make a difference where the game is played?

First of all, both teams abide by the same rules. It isn't as if the American League gets a DH and the National League doesn't.

Secondly, with so many pitchers and players on the All-Star roster, players are substituted in almost every inning, so it's as if they have a (fresh) designated hitter, any way.

2006-07-14 06:43:46 · answer #3 · answered by Baseball Fanatic 5 · 0 0

yes, American League still win the All-Star Game next year. Nex year, the all-star game should playing in America League ballpark.

If America team won the All-Star Game, then take the home advanage in World Series,

2006-07-14 07:19:07 · answer #4 · answered by DXTRCHN11 6 · 0 0

No, they should eliminate that ridiculously stupid policy and go back to rotating it back and forth between the AL and NL. Or give home team advantage to the team with the best record. But making the decision based on the outcome of the dog-and-pony show that is the stupid all-star game is asinine.

It's no wonder major league baseball is losing fans left and right. They're clueless. The real America's pastime is now football.

2006-07-14 05:32:43 · answer #5 · answered by Neerdowellian 6 · 0 0

Yes absolutely,
they won the all-star game that's all there is to it.
I'm not just saying that because I am an American League fan.
I am not,
I'm a National league fan.

Go Cards!!!!!!!!

2006-07-14 13:00:39 · answer #6 · answered by Grumpy 6 · 0 0

Since the AL will win the All-Star game again anyway, they should not play the game and automatically give the AL team home field.

Will make it easier for the White Sox to win their 3rd title in a row.

2006-07-14 06:22:54 · answer #7 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0 0

i don't think of the All megastar recreation ought to make sure who receives living house container benefit till they substitute the rule of thumb that each crew desires to have one participant. With this rule you won't be able to say that both communities are making use of absolutely the finest of the league and for this reason it will be an exhibition. living house container ought to visit the crew with the most acceptable record or perchance they'd have a a million recreation playoff in a impartial web site to ascertain who receives it.

2016-11-02 01:33:49 · answer #8 · answered by mcthay 4 · 0 0

No... they have to win the All-Star game next year for that to happen... don't you follow baseball at all?

2006-07-14 06:14:00 · answer #9 · answered by -- 4 · 0 0

no

2006-07-14 06:46:37 · answer #10 · answered by andthensome 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers