Liberals, what are YOUR ideas to solve this growing problems?

Question

Here's the question in a different way: I am interested in know what you Liberals think are ideas or solutions to this growing problem. What's the root cause, not just to place blame, but to solve it? I'm not interested in your Neo-con drivel. I am asking this question to get a perspective as to how you would go about solving this.

http://redtape.msnbc.com/2006/07/video_hand_bomb.html

Answer 1

they'll have to ask nancy pelosi, howard dean and ted kennedy what they should say first..
i imagine it will be something like "bush has lied to us" or "there were no wmd's"...or "the war is illegal"
then..without giving a solution, they will demand you vote for them so they can "fix" it....

Answer 2

Its funny you ask liberals to answer a question, and your first 5 posters are all anti-Lib.

You ask for the 'liberal' answer to 'solve this growing problem'. Your link is to an article that talks about violent videos taken by teenagers for entertainment's sake.

The article itself argues there is not a growing problem, that most people go to the site looking for humor, etc. and the gruesome or gory videos aren't that popular.

So this just sounds like more rightwing making an issue out a non-issue, like alleged War on Christmas, etc.

There is no problem here. Neither liberal left or conservative right has anything to solve.

I wish your question would have been more honest.

Answer 3

this goes so deep that i can not explain this in the space provided.
1) control we have control issues.with our kids
2) violence is part of the video games played by kids who are locked in there homes after school and never allowed to go out for fear something will happen to them .
3)war we are so close to the end all the time kids have no plans for a future and today may be all they have in there minds
4)these three factors contibute to the mentality i must defend myself from all attacks and a simple insult turns violent when a crowed is gathered it is there manhood on the line and there respect at stake winners are glorified and lossers shuned.
SO when challenged you must fight or be come the weak who are prayed on once challenged and beat by kids who have grown up fighting there whole lives revenge becomes the problem with police and jail for the less fortunate among the two .the poor kid goes to jail when the rich kids folks call the cops .
WE live in a violent world and until parents teach there kids war is wrong and leave jobs making weapons for death and war kids will be confused when half of america says the war is wrong and the other is making a living from it we have bsttles in our streets and schools like never before.
We must beome peacefull if we expect any better from our kids todays meesege is bring it on and the laws do not matter cause bush said the constitution is just a piece of paper .OUR mentality is shaped by our leaders and parents and half of them are making a living working for war taxing the poor to pay for there lifestyle and the kids are smmarter then you think.

Answer 4

The liberals need to continue to get the ignorant masses to blame Bush and all the cons/reps, then get into office, raise taxes on the rich people forcing them to hire more illegal immigrants so they can keep their investments. Then, become worshipped by Hollywood celebrities and drive off in the sunset in their SUV limos to hug a tree and save the planet. In the meantime, the muslim extremists will continue to build their war machines and eventually destroy us one city at a time. Then as we crumble, the republican politicians will blame the liberal administration in order to get 8 more years in the White House.
But all that will matter is what will Britney Spears' next baby look like..

God Bless America

Answer 5

GET BUSH OUT
, first constitution of the United States. The Articles were in force from March 1, 1781, to June 21, 1788, when the present Constitution of the United States went into effect. The Articles were written in 1777 during the early part of the American Revolution by a committee of the Second Continental Congress of the 13 colonies. The head of the committee, John Dickinson, presented a report on the proposed articles to the Congress on July 12, 1776, eight days after the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Dickinson initially proposed a strong central government, with control over the western lands, equal representation for the states, and the power to levy taxes. See also Public Lands: II. Acquisition of the Public Domain.

Because of their experience with Great Britain, the 13 states feared a powerful central government; consequently, they changed Dickinson’s proposed articles drastically before they sent them to all the states for ratification in November 1777. The Continental Congress had been careful to give the states as much independence as possible and to specify the limited functions of the federal government. Despite these precautions, several years passed before all the states ratified the articles. The delay resulted from preoccupation with the revolution and from disagreements among the states. These disagreements included quarrels over boundary lines, conflicting decisions by state courts, differing tariff laws, and trade restrictions between states. The small states wanted equal representation with the large states in Congress, and the large states were afraid they would have to pay an excessive amount of money to support the federal government. In addition, the states disagreed over control of the western territories. The states with no frontier borders wanted the government to control the sale of these territories so that all the states profited. On the other hand, the states bordering the frontier wanted to control as much land as they could. Eventually the states agreed to give control of all western lands to the federal government, paving the way for final ratification of the articles on March 1, 1781.

II The Provisions of the Articles

Print this section | Edit this section
The articles created a loose confederation of independent states that gave limited powers to a central government. The national government would consist of a single house of Congress, where each state would have one vote. Congress had the power to set up a postal department, to estimate the costs of the government and request donations from the states, to raise armed forces, and to control the development of the western territories. With the consent of nine of the thirteen states, Congress could also coin, borrow, or appropriate money as well as declare war and enter into treaties and alliances with foreign nations.

There was no independent executive and no veto of legislation. Judicial proceedings in each state were to be honored by all other states. The federal government had no judicial branch, and the only judicial authority Congress had was the power to arbitrate disputes between states. Congress was denied the power to levy taxes; the new federal government was financed by donations from the states based on the value of each state’s lands. Any amendment to the articles required the unanimous approval of all 13 states.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Answer 6

As others pronounced, there is no "transforming into gun violence difficulty," with a extra-or-a lot less secure decline in the course of the former few a lengthy time period, so that you'll be able to take care of the "develop" with the help of purely turning off your television. inspite of the actuality that, there is little doubt the issue calls for addressing. Likewise, the NRA's "extra guns, a lot less crime" is a reductio ad absurdum, yet consists of some reality. permitting good people to arm themselves does look to diminish violent crime. it isn't, for sure, a panacea, notwithstanding it should not be discounted as a small constructive contributor. the substantial parts of action, although, are in psychological well being themes, customary crime administration, and taking heavily guidelines already on the books. that's lengthy been commonly used that psychological well being amenities are grossly underfunded and of restricted availability. We also opt to take care of the civil rights difficulty of compelling people to undergo psychological well being remedy, yet that would't be executed till/till the amenities are available. Likewise, extra valuable policing procedures have a tendency to diminish crime. and also, civil rights themes should be pronounced. there'll, and should be, an ongoing stress in such discussions, and it will be executed with a lot less of the present denigration of opposing critiques. The NRA has for decades pronounced that many serious consequences are already on the books, and hardly ever effect in prosecutions and detention center time, for unlawful sale and unlawful use of firearms. we ought to continually insist that their position be taken heavily and in no way swept less than the rug with the help of apologists for the branch of Justice, which both activities have had.

Answer 7

Obviously it is to raise taxes so we can throw money at the problem. Page 3 "How to be a good Liberal"

Answer 8

Liberals want to gain power using poor peopel as their support. They can't really solve problems

Answer 9

LIBS would Impeach Bush and tell everybody that the problem is solved.


LOL

Answer 10

RAISE TAXES