Women are already asserting themselves in every facet of our lives & thank GOD they are. Women have taken the reigns of gov't in several countries & have quietly been improving the lot of the PEOPLE. You see women are the mothers of ALL OF US & as mothers they don't like to see their children ANY OF THEIR CHILDREN come to harm. Women are leading the way in every facet of GOODNESS for HUMANITY as a whole. We are ALL ONE BEING ONE MIND, each of us is like a neuron that pulses in the brain of course their are billions of neurons in the brain so as there are many minds all connected together in one CONSCIOUSNESS. Some of you may think no I'm an individual seperate from everyone else when the truth is if you're alive you're CONNECTED & we communicate with each other. Let's all communicate that the women's Will - Will Hold Sway in our world, NO more killing, NO more violence, NO more hunger, NO more thirst, no more Homeless, NO more poverty. IAM putting my entire WILL behind ALL THEIR EFFORT
2006-07-14 03:57:20 · 12 answers · asked by henry a 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I don't want a patriarchy......but I do NOT want a matriarchy either.
Count me out, babe.
2006-07-14 04:01:41 · answer #1 · answered by Nikki 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We like to think of the world as being a place that can only be ruled by one gender or the other. But in such a world, only half the neurons of the brain will be firing at once.
Women do have a greater propensity for peace and compassion. If they try to force this on men then men will just become upset and uncooperative. But if women educate men and show them a better way, then all of humankind will be better off.
2006-07-14 04:03:59 · answer #2 · answered by Conrad 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you think that women ruling the world will bring peace, you are dead wrong. It is not like women were never leaders before.
Every time in history when a Woman was elevated to as status of Ruler of Nation she behaved in exactly the same way -- a man would!
Meaning, she ruled as she so fit -- she was nice sometimes and was ruthless when the circumstances were right.
Consider:
Elizabeth I of England sponsored pirates to terrorize ships of other nations(Francis Drake) and started Anglo-Spanish War.[1]
Golda Meir of Israel authorized the Mossad to kill Black September in retaliation of 1972 Olympics massacre. She also showed ruthlessness in conducting the Yom Kippur war.[2]
Catherine II of Russia initiated numerous Russo-Turkish Wars and annexed Crimea.[3]
More recently Margaret Thatcher was known as "Iron Lady." She also "punished" the unionists which led to Anglo-Irish War. [4]
So women have demonstrated ability to be as violent and tyrannical as men -- so giving them the rule will not really change much-- there would still be wars murder and destruction.
2006-07-14 06:22:44 · answer #3 · answered by hq3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thoroughly consider you... lady because the moms of the earth and the vendors of the folk. we've a good heart, viable plans, and favor and desires that should be reached. i believe it really is nicely overdue for the international to have many lady leaders.... it really is nicely over due for america to have a lady president. With the affection and better half that come evidently with lady, it really isn't any ask your self that this international ought to grow to be a extra valuable, thriving position. not in common words the following, yet in the course of the country. for lady as an finished are non violent and characteristic favor to be particular all of Gods little ones are useful and treated. the boys of this international are literally not waiting to succumb to the submission of a lady and her procedures.... men imagine with conflict, destruction and prevailing. lady imagine of life, high quality and forgiveness.... i don't think of that we ought to have such an difficulty of poverty, affliction and conflict if there have been a lady president, for she ought to hotel to attempting to heal.. particularly than attempting to take over. purely because we do not stay interior an same area, we stay interior an same international, and this international........ no remember the distances between us, with make or ruin the customary international as an finished!
2016-11-02 01:27:18 · answer #4 · answered by rangnow 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!!! We woman are suppose to start supporting each other and helping along side the powers that be.
The problems of this world did not come about by separate, single thought but by plots of sick groups that want separate and one sided dominance.
We need each other to solve this worlds problems. Not woman control PMS drive. But together solutions, natured in love.
2006-07-14 04:56:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As bad as men can be I think I would prefer a democracy for all or a patriarchy because all though a society were one gender or another is in control is bad I think it would be worse if women were that gender in control. But anyway democracy works for me.
2006-07-14 04:16:30 · answer #6 · answered by Victoria W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't. I think it's time for women to put men back in the driver's seat and use our influence for good instead of trying to run things.
2006-07-14 04:30:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It isn't an accident or some sort of amazing coincidence that every single relevant civilization of the last 30,000 years has at minimum been de facto patriarchal. But thanks for the hyperbole.
2006-07-15 03:53:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we will all be better here in america when a woman finally runs and becomes presadent....
2006-07-14 04:02:55 · answer #9 · answered by goatlady 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you girls can stop GW Bush and his cronies, I'm all for it!
:-D
2006-07-14 04:02:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋