This guy is loved by most in latin america, and did obviously care about helping the poor. But at the same time he supported oppresive communist regimes (in particular the USSR), which forced people to conform to the communist way and denied them the freedom leave their country.
2006-07-14 03:14:18 · 12 answers · asked by pantocool 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
A symbol of rebellion! Could not live his dream in his home country of Argentina so invades Cuba to begin a revolution full of idealism creating the concept 'GERILLA WARFARE'
He believed in the poorer nations up rise against the US and the former Soviet Union's exploitation. In doing so he opened "a can of worms'.
He wanted justice! But at what cost? a price on anyone who stood in his way. Power driven, hunger for identity idealistic views of what he believed to be right but at the same time anger and hatred being a primary drive.
I agree that some countries just take from the poorer ones but everyone is responsible for this cycle. There are also the endless charities from western countries who contribute and help out the developing world like OXFAM, UNICEF, RED CROSS etc, etc.
By condemning other political leaders he would crash innocent people like you and me the working class people of the world.
A VILLAIN
2006-07-14 05:23:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dee 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Most people who are admired as heros also have their villainous side. The idea that a hero could be all good is out of touch with reality.
2006-07-14 03:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Larry 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definately a hero. He did it for all the right reasons!! Check out the Motorcyle diaries for more info..
2006-07-14 03:18:01 · answer #3 · answered by Rupee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A hero figure. The myth of the hero is helped by the fact that he died young.
2006-07-14 03:18:52 · answer #4 · answered by Georgie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
after I first registered this account on Yahoo, it became meant as an outlet for particularly leftist political reviews. I used Che Guevara's favourite photo from the early Nineteen Sixties as my avatar, until eventually I later got here to the accurate that it became merely too divisive for absolutely everyone to take my perspectives heavily. obviously, Che's legacy is marred. What do i imagine of him in my opinion? i imagine he became a fashionable who stood for what he believed. i'd talk with lack of comprehend-how right here, yet i don't have self belief he inspired the killing of harmless human beings; he did besides the undeniable fact that promote civil unrest in South usa of america and Africa. He considered Western ideology with cynicism, capitalism with resentment, and the impoverished human beings of the international as sufferers of greed. He stated violence as a approach to an end, it is a stance I strongly disagree with in spite of the underlying beliefs. to respond to your question extra straight away, it would remember upon your definition of heroism - or, compared, your theory of what constitutes villainy. Che became someone who fought with brutality hostile to the suffering and alienation that exists in hierarchical societies. i'd get countless flack for putting forward this, yet I evaluate Ronald Reagan to be no extra heroic than Che Guevara. both meant to carry prosperity to their human beings, yet also straight away or indirectly brought with reference to the deaths of many human beings. i comprehend it is a marginally inappropriate aspect, yet many times those opposing Che are of a similar political alignment as those who help Reagan and that i evaluate it to be an inconsistent software of morality.
2016-11-06 09:03:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was Castro's executioner. By his own accounts he personally murdered or directed the murder of some 1,000 to 1,500 prisoners.
He was as much a humanitarian as Dr. Mengele.
2006-07-14 03:22:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It matters to whom:
To Cancervatives and racists, he's a sombrero-waring, socialist mofo. "What kind of sicko wants freedom,"
To people of color (mostly Blacks and Hispanics), he's a true freedom fighter and a sort of misunderstood hero.
To everyone else, he's just a guy in history.
2006-07-14 03:38:34 · answer #7 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HERO.Helped the poor.Hated the Capitalist's who are always exploiting the poor for their own gains.
2006-07-14 05:42:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam of Latin America!! if he'd been in charge of Iraq i think we may not be alive as a world!!
Sick mo fo!!
2006-07-14 03:19:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Che Guevarra, hero or villain?
Hmmmmm how about, TOSSER!!!
2006-07-14 07:00:40 · answer #10 · answered by Jack 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋