English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In John Q the movie with Denzel Washington, what are some of the social concepts/issues?

I am looking for exact terminology, as in Ideology and discrimination.

Can anyone help?

2006-07-14 02:54:18 · 3 answers · asked by mediocre_poet 3 in Social Science Sociology

3 answers

Some concepts:
Individualist verses communitarian (or collectivism) focus: Denzel is a dedicated father/husband, where the hospital administrator seems to subscribe more to the idea that you are entitled to what your means allow.
Rational/legal vs relational ethics: again, Denzel feels obligated due to his parentage, where the administrator feels obligation due to her fiduciary responsibility to the hospital.
Universalist verses particularist ethics: Denzel does subscribe to justice and fairness for all, but given the circumstance, he himself admits he must do what he must for his son. The administrator, while easy to paint as a villain, is likely to treat all people with equal consideration and apply consistent rules to each.
The interesting part of the movie is how many folks transition from one of these extremes to the other. The doctor and nurses seems to begin with rational legal and universalistic tendencies, yet later given their assessment of Denzel's character, make an exception to help him, knowing full well that they could not possibly help all people in need with the same depth.
These are cultural concepts, you could also view this through institutional (structural) terminology, but I'm not as familiar with these. Another POV would be through rational choice concepts, but they tend to be less interesting for people outside of academic hyperventilators like myself.

Good luck with this.

2006-07-14 08:17:10 · answer #1 · answered by bizsmithy 5 · 1 0

the biggest difficulty, of direction, is the coverage coverage. the very incontrovertible actuality that in case you do not have coverage, the medical institution gained't admit you is dumb. everybody desires healthcare. you won't be able to shrink back damage people. second, the issue is money comes first. To a medical institution, you'll have money earlier try to be treated. In Mike's case, they would not positioned him on the donor's record till they'd a series quantity of money. in the intervening time, Mike is lack of life in a medical institution room. you should imagine about the affected individual earlier the expenses. life is nicely worth more advantageous than money.

2016-11-02 01:22:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is really tackles the greed surrounding the HMO business and insurance companies. If you want to find out more do a search of John

2006-07-14 03:18:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers