Either there IS no baby, or the baby is ugly as hell, and they are getting emergency plastic surgery on her before they show her in public.
What do you think???
2006-07-14 02:28:25 · 24 answers · asked by a kinder, gentler me 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Okay, I don't really care, except for the fact that it all seems kind of fishy. Katie Holmes is from Toledo, OH....I am from Toledo, OH...so I have a mild interest because Tom is such a whackjob, and Katie is being brainwashed or strong-armed, or something...
...and someone says they are not showing the baby because it's a cheap publicity stunt? Did you forget who we're talking about?
2006-07-14 03:11:51 · update #1
See what happened is this. Baby Suri was a "Body Thetan", so naturally Lord "Xenu" and his army from the "Galactic Confederacy", were compelled to take the hapless child to an "Implant Station" (aka a volcano). Once her identity has been successfully erased, she will be returned to the loving couple.
And I thought fundies were nuts...
2006-07-15 01:29:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I was reading an article that there are some weird things going on with the birth certificate. Like neither Tom Cruise nor Katie Holmes signed it. And it wasn't filed until 3 weeks after the birth.
Very weird.
2006-07-14 10:01:26 · answer #2 · answered by cutengraceless 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Weird is the understatement here.
I think he wants everyone to wonder. It will be good for his next Mission Impossible movie.
He is a controlling freak of nature. Has the Napoleon syndrome.
Katie is way too young for him.
Oh well! At least they won't have to divorce since they are not married.
At this point I don't care if there is a baby or not.
As Archie Bunker said "STIFLE IT".
2006-07-15 01:00:16 · answer #3 · answered by cheeky chic 379 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To tell the truth, I dont really give a **** about Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes baby. It could have a dick growing out of its forehead and I still wouldnt care.
2006-07-14 09:31:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is good that they are not flaunting the child all over the media but because it is Tom Cruise it is all a bit fishy. They say it's a Scientology rule about not showing it off but I'd put money on the fact that it is one hairy baby.
2006-07-14 09:44:15 · answer #5 · answered by sticky 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that they are not showing the baby because she's still so young and the photographers might disturb her with their cameras, and besides maybe they don't want to use her to be in the spotlight, maybe they don't want to use her as an easy way ticket so they could be more famous.
A new born should be in a safe environment next to his parents, away from everybody else, away from the noise.
2006-07-14 09:59:52 · answer #6 · answered by doulz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Weirdness weirdness weirdness.
Plus Tom is already so weird. He is operating on some plan that he concocted while still married to Nicole. I wonder if she didn't convert to Scientology within an agreed timespan. I think she was taked off guard.
Aside from Nicole, what about his other two kids. I wonder what they think of their dad's shenanigans this past year.
2006-07-14 09:36:37 · answer #7 · answered by Applecore782 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait til Cruise has another movie to promote. Then I bet we'll meet the baby.
I've been wondering the same thing.
2006-07-14 21:28:13 · answer #8 · answered by Lanani 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Tom fag boy Cruise is just showing off how much he is in charge. The baby is cute hopefully she takes after her mom and not fag boy he's butt *** ugly
2006-07-14 09:32:35 · answer #9 · answered by Kookie M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i hate tom cruise and i'm not a big fan of katie holmes, so i really just don't give a fu*k about their baby.
2006-07-14 09:40:35 · answer #10 · answered by Sassy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋