English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

USA because George Bush would arrest everyone on the Saudia Arabian team under the pretext that they are terrorists yet have no way to prove it!!

2006-07-14 04:03:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That final would never happened in my lifetime but the USA is a better team so they would beat Saudi Arabia.

2006-07-14 10:16:30 · answer #2 · answered by MartinPalermo 3 · 0 0

USA if they put in Demarcus Beasley, for some speed and only if Landon Donovan actually does something, he has been a step behind his whole team this World Cup!

2006-07-14 09:30:03 · answer #3 · answered by Naples 2 · 0 0

USA - if they got into trouble they would call in a tactical airstrike and waste the Saudi defense then score

2006-07-14 09:29:36 · answer #4 · answered by jonnygaijin 5 · 0 0

of course saudi arabia cause USA sucks n since saudi has sami al jaber of course they would win.

2006-07-14 09:34:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saudi Arabia...USA sucks hard!!!!

2006-07-14 09:30:16 · answer #6 · answered by il_caffe_mi_rende_nervosa 3 · 0 0

If you mean, if US had played KSA in the final, it is hard to say. Neither team covered itself with glory in the early rounds. I would have expected that KSA would have done better than it did, because soccer is quite popular there.

2006-07-14 09:32:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that will never happen!!! but i would prefer saudi arabia because i am arabian

2006-07-14 10:06:22 · answer #8 · answered by Herbicide 6 · 0 0

usa

2006-07-14 09:27:59 · answer #9 · answered by cricket player 2 · 0 0

Santa Claus, as that final would never hapen even in your dreams.

2006-07-14 09:30:24 · answer #10 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers