USA because George Bush would arrest everyone on the Saudia Arabian team under the pretext that they are terrorists yet have no way to prove it!!
2006-07-14 04:03:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That final would never happened in my lifetime but the USA is a better team so they would beat Saudi Arabia.
2006-07-14 10:16:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by MartinPalermo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA if they put in Demarcus Beasley, for some speed and only if Landon Donovan actually does something, he has been a step behind his whole team this World Cup!
2006-07-14 09:30:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Naples 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA - if they got into trouble they would call in a tactical airstrike and waste the Saudi defense then score
2006-07-14 09:29:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by jonnygaijin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course saudi arabia cause USA sucks n since saudi has sami al jaber of course they would win.
2006-07-14 09:34:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saudi Arabia...USA sucks hard!!!!
2006-07-14 09:30:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by il_caffe_mi_rende_nervosa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you mean, if US had played KSA in the final, it is hard to say. Neither team covered itself with glory in the early rounds. I would have expected that KSA would have done better than it did, because soccer is quite popular there.
2006-07-14 09:32:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that will never happen!!! but i would prefer saudi arabia because i am arabian
2006-07-14 10:06:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Herbicide 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
usa
2006-07-14 09:27:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by cricket player 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Santa Claus, as that final would never hapen even in your dreams.
2006-07-14 09:30:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by brogdenuk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋