I'd go with representative democracy. It works for a couple of hundred years until the oligarchy and liberal pollitical correctness takes over and changes the meaning of what your constitution really stood for. By then, I'd be long gone.
2006-07-14 02:08:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by BigRichGuy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democracy
2006-07-14 09:11:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by batsey99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think I would choose a dictatorship coz I think we humans as a race tend to misuse freedom of choice.
I think I would have a core security council that decides the laws that will be forcibly enforced and of course I woudl have VETO powers..... Just in case.
2006-07-14 09:08:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Captain Haddock 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democracy - it is the most fair form of government for everybody. It is also important to have the basic freedoms in this government - IE speech, religion, etc
2006-07-14 09:08:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Patrick H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dictatorship at first, then i would make law anything and every change i wanted, then i would quit, and create a republic
republic to serve the people, but less likely to change all the good work i did.
2006-07-14 09:06:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by holdon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dictatorship. The masses are ignorant as a whole.
2006-07-14 09:08:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Kingdom...and democracy...which I live in...
John
2006-07-14 09:21:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Scorpion 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
eenie meenie miney moe and one potato two potato always worked well on the playground.
2006-07-14 09:08:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
anarchy
And may the best man or woman win.
2006-07-14 09:10:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
democracy & social
be more social-econoimc
but ppls could be free like democracy in us or uk.....
2006-07-14 09:09:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by aviv7337 2
·
0⤊
0⤋