Which is the best system of government,capitalist,socialist,communist,dictatorship,traditional?

Answer 1

Anarchy 4 EVER!
Anarchism me friend ;-)
Is the BEST for ALL people =)

Contrary to belief Anarchy does not mean structurelessness, it’s just a different way of structuring society without hierarchy (without authoritarianism). Thus it does NOT mean Chaos...

You're more talking about Economics more then government, a structure of goverance can be seporate from the economic system, hence you can have a King and Capitalims or a type of Democracy with capitalism (yes there are different types of Democracies, and some Democracies do not consider Capitalism as a Democratic Economy thus they do not see it should be included in a pure Democracy, but that depends on the type of foundation or rules a Democracy is set upon)

Some links to prove my point ;-) Hehehehehee

Structure of Government:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
Structure of Government:
http://www.infoshop.org/
Structure of Government:
http://www.illegalvoices.org/
Structure of Government:
http://www.aforanarchy.com/

Economic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Really_really_free_market
Economic:
http://www.carrboro.com/reallyreallyfreemarket/
Economic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy
Economic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_economics
Economic:
http://www.zmag.org/parecon/indexnew.htm
Economic:
http://www.freecycle.org/

Structure of Government:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy
Structure of Government:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassroots_democracy
Structure of Government:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus

Structure of Government & Conflict Resolution:
http://www.consensus.net/

There, that should have you reading and finding new ideas for a while and in NO time ;-)

And as anyone can see, Anarchy is happening right under their noses LOL (as we type and read on Yahoo Answers, it's here, it's been here, and it's here to stay and move on)! We'll spring up under them, one person at a time like a wild fire... just by the act of living and structuring our lives different, that alone will be Anarchy ;-)

::: Peace :::

Answer 2

Capitilast,

But not in the way that early conservative thinkers describe it.........free market, laize faire.......these are jokes....because they never adhere to greed, and the ulitmate goal is to eliminate all competition and create monopoly's..................true in Teddy Rosevelts time as it is today......

Not only that but the market solution is also a joke...

Captitalism is great, it reflects our societies value of a meritcracy, is it perfect no, should it be regulated.....hell yes.....jusk ask KEN LAY......opps sorry.

The government has a very very important role in regulation, to protect the people and our companies.

why not pure socialism, or a socialist stae...........because competition does offer economies of scale and that is good........
a
complete socialist state wouldn't work, but the Government can take actions that although appear socialist benifit Capliatilsm
should the government provide Healthcare to everyone....hell yes.......

The less money private companies pay for health care, the more money they can reinvest to compete on a global market.

Answer 3

As our leaders are all corrupt, we would be better off without them.

Quite simply the people would do a better job of leading themselves, it's not surprising that the people in power portray Anarchism as a very bad thing (kaos, violence), but this is not correct as most crimes are a result of inequality.
If people were so eager to kill each other, the human race would not have progresed past the "caveman" stage. ie. whenever two cavemen met, only one would survive.

Around the world, whenever an alternative political systems have emerged they have been brutally crushed, or isolated by our ruling elites for what they call "the threat of a good example"

The people in power will not give it up easily, we may have to fight for a better deal, but greed will be their downfall.

Answer 4

I believe it was Winston Churchill who said (and I paraphase) that a democracy is a horrible way for a people to be governed but that it certainly beats all the other options. That said, I see no way that a true democracy can be anything else but capitalistic. Besides, all the other economic models have failed. Capitalism is the last man standing.

Answer 5

Depends on your point of view - I mean if you're the despotic dictatorin a hardline dictatorship, life's probably quite good. If you're a rich capitalist, the world seems fair. Although; if anarchy reigned free, what would all the anarchists rebel against?

Answer 6

Capitalism and Democracy go hand in hand. They, whilst not perfect, have stood the test of time. Left wing/Communist governments on the other hand, haven't stood the test of time: They are oppressive and have failed. Nannying, is one of the symptoms of a left wing totalitarian government. There are still a lot of control freaks out there who can't let go of the left wing approach, because it gives them personal power, even if it is an appalling way to run a country.

Answer 7

Until we realise what is truly valuable to the human race as a whole it will be money and power that rules in any political system. I believe politics is man made to protect personal interests.

This is only my personal observation

Answer 8

the best system of government is limited-fortunes capitalism

capitalism is good in every way, except it permits legal theft, ie, the rich get richer, ie, the rich get more and more per unit of work, the rich do less and less work per dollar got

this has gone on so long we now have pay from $1 to $1 billion for the same amount of work, a fortnight's work - ie, from a 1000th to a million times the average pay

return to founding fathers idea of limitation of fortunes to the maximum a person can really earn and deserve, ie, to how much a person can add wealth to society [US$2 million] - bible says: dont pay for not working, but we are paying rich people up to a million times average hourly pay - which is theft, which makes underpay [slaver] which makes violence, which has escalated weaponry to the brink of destruction of planet

everyone to take out only as much as they put in

limit fortunes and spread the overfortune equally among all

money automatically concentrates in few hands, which makes tyranny which makes slavery which makes war - counter that by limiting fortunes, and spreading the overpay around equally

then you have no super overpaid, superoverpowerful destroying democracy and freedom, warmongering, murdering millions at will - then you have no anger among the underpaid and overworked

1% get 90% of world income - US$70 trillion a year - leaving the 99% to get 10%

extreme injustice [ theft] extreme violence, escalating, screaming racing to extinction, thanks to e=mc2 and nuclear winter

we cant keep getting closer to ww3 without arriving

save yourselves - capitalism without overpay/underpay

you know it works - if a govt took 90% of income permanently off 90% of people, and gave it to 1%, it would cause super violence - and stopping that would stop the violence

we have extreme injustice, nothing will fix it except justice - limitation of fortunes to the most a person can contribute to social pool of wealth by work - or keep racing to planet suicide

rich people dont make money, they rake money -

the average prson works 50 hours a week - so no one can work more than twice as hard as the average - above that, it is raking wealth, ie stealing money legally, taking out more than you put in

bill gates at peak puts in one hour's work and takes out the fruits of a million hours' work - at average, he takes out 50,000 hours work for every hour he has put in - which means at the other end others have to take out less than they put in - the last ones take out so little they starve to death

take the injustice of 'the rich get richer, etc' from capitalism and you will have world peace

you know it, because you know what would happen if a govt stopped taking [stealing] 90% off 90% of citizens

Answer 9

The best Government has to be a democratically elected one.

Answer 10

I would love to have my own island and see how anarchy works for a while..... but then I suppose I'd have to stage a military coup or something and it might get a bit expensive.