Middle East - since he supports Israel's action?
2006-07-13 20:48:48 · 11 answers · asked by twinklecomfort 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
of course he is.., my husband been there twice already
2006-07-13 20:51:19 · answer #1 · answered by ~*~ Stormy Weather~*~ 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
He's already involved. Who do you think paid for all those missiles that were fired into Lebanon yesterday?
He's always put himself firmly behind Israel and all of its actions, no matter how idiotic that position is, so if Israel decide to declare war (and they pretty much have already) they'll have the full support of the American military.
2006-07-13 20:55:58 · answer #2 · answered by Bapboy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a common question being asked, but I think you should take another look at what you're asking.
The U.S. holds the influence over Israel. Bush hasn't outright said he agrees with the moves they've made, just because he said that 'Israel has the right to defend itself'. Don't ignore that he also expressed concern over the negative implications the moves place on Lebanon's anti-Syrian government. He very much wants that to stay intact.
Our government is tolerating Israel's "RESPONSE" to being attacked, but that doesn't mean we're going to let them attack every enemy they have in the region.
They've been given the green light to rock the boat, not sink it.
2006-07-13 20:54:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that W. will get the US involved in any war he can. Why? simple. He was too chicken to serve his country and got his daddy to get him enlisted in the ANG, Louisana I think, So that he wouldnt have to go to Vietnam. Now there is some bit of shame being put on him after the last "election" and he hope to make up for his cowardice abck in the 60's.
2006-07-14 01:13:21 · answer #4 · answered by mikemcgraw3 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That one place the us will never touch for many reasons .Any way Israel is very capable of taking care of them selves since they have much of the technology we have .They are the power in the middle east.
2006-07-13 20:53:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that will happen if Iran doesn't take the UN's advanced technology package deal for light water reactors. Otherwise, looks like WW3 will start on the same day WW1 did, with the kidnapping of the Israeli soldier.
2006-07-13 21:06:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first modification exists so as that individuals can criticise their personal authorities so the authorities actual acts out the purposes of the individuals. Shutting up is "unpatriotic" i'd anticipate. yet then because the completed of the U. S. authorities looks corrupted by technique of money, money, and better money, and under no circumstances bothering with the votes, what distinction does it make?
2016-12-01 06:26:56 · answer #7 · answered by tramble 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. We're already up to our necks in pycho @ss extremists ... we will only get involved as a last resort ... and that will only be with Airstrikes, Cruise Missile Strikes, and possibly ICBM strikes in @$$ed up IRAN. Watch ... mark my words and remember ... YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST!!!
2006-07-13 20:52:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israeli soldiers are excellent. U.S.A. supplies military hardware and intelligence.
2006-07-13 20:54:42 · answer #9 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He absolutely should! Israel is our ally, and the radical moslems should all be shown who they're messing with.
2006-07-13 21:02:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope so, We need to use every reason to go shoot more terrorists.
2006-07-13 20:53:36 · answer #11 · answered by Kathy O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋