cause a lot people fall for crappy music if its marketed well.
2006-07-13 20:33:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by dem_young_onez 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The reason why the music industry is filled with lots of talentless artists/musicians (I dispise calling them musicians because they're not, they're just air and honestly the music industry is getting worse when it comes to signing up new "talent".) is because most of them are supposedly attractive. However, I disagree with you saying that Christina Aguilera is untalented because that woman has one of the best singing voices that I've ever heard in my life! She does need to write more lyrics for her songs though. Hopefully her new album that will be released next month will blow all of Britney Spears' work out of the water. Some "artists" that I don't like include: Rihanna, Christina Milian, Cassie, and Britney Spears.
- A Christina fan
2006-07-13 20:39:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by thewiseone 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Its all about timing, your publicist, inital investment capital, but mostly how well you get publicized/marketed. By the way, all the people you listed aren't musicians at all. They are all SINGERS....there is a DISTINCT difference. It also helps if you've got big boobs if you want to make it big as a singer. Jessica had big boobs and could sing alright so now Nick is famous. Brittne and Christina were both together with Justin Timberlake and a few others on Mickey Mouse Club back in the day!
2006-07-13 20:36:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by bombhaus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
although i could go on for days regarding this topic ..........i will limit this to a small paragraph ...........
it is a really an industry run almost entirely by rich , tone deaf individuals who are driven by greed .......... as opposed to talent , desire , and a true love for music . These industry bigwigs view the general public as sheep , who will willingly fork over their hard earned dough , for whatever current flavor of the week they're serving . Meanwhile , the smaller independent artists are forced to market and publicize themselves , using their own limited funds , while the pipeline force-feeds the willing masses their just desserts ..........ah what a world ............
2006-07-13 20:52:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by BIGG AL 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mostly beacause this type of music is marketed towards the teenage demographic. These are young impressionable people whos fickle tastes change from one fad to the next. It is all based on how you look, rather than substance. Where these kids go, so does their money.
2006-07-13 20:40:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by riktus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i completly agree guy. it is what i wrote in a query clone of this... you're completely proper and infrequently it appears like no individual else notices. Like if i'm at a acquaintances living house and they play the radio, i purely won't be able to stand it because each thing is so stupid. And music is like the mirrored image of people. So what's this putting forward about people? that they haven't any thoughts or ideas or some thing. each music on the radio is so mainstream and gay. They play an same 5 ******* songs persistently. that's superb in case you want some thing catchy. yet won't be able to you write some thing catchy that still has some substance. Does no individual have any expertise?? If i opt to take heed to good music, I genuinely ought to take heed to old music. Like '70s or maybe '80s. music like rap and pa are so shallow. yet they imagine they are like so cool cus they are so bitchin, i don't know. yet a minimum of songs from the '70s and '80s were about some thing. Like insurrection and adjust and human rights. The very last era had Bob Dylan, the Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin. What can we've, "Kiss Me through the phone" with the help of Soulja Boy. Like, wtf??? The radio performed "Battlefield" with the help of Jordin Sparks. gay. It replaced into like "Love is a Battlefield" stripped of all feeling, beat, melody, pastime, expertise and origanality. i imagine the issue is that the media feeds youthful, extremely inspired young ones mainstream music in case you want to mildew us how they'd like us to be, without feeling and keenness. That way, we are going to have position self assurance in them and they can regulate us besides they'd like, they can make revenues on undesirable singers and 'musicians' while not having to seek for someone who's genuinely good. that's all managed with the help of the guy. and that is what people do not comprehend. i wager the worlds lengthy gone mad [: Edit... btw im 15. and my moms and dads were curiously vast tokers in the 70s so that they know all about good music. and yeah, its like each people good died in extremely random procedures. like Bob Marley, Kurt Cobain, Jimi Hendrix, John Lennon, Elvis, Jerry Garcia, Joey Ramone and those men that died on 'the Day the music Died' even Michael Jackson. wierd stuff..
2016-11-02 01:08:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by seelye 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nowadays it is easy to make music. People also fall for the glamour and the marketing. MTV is primarily to blame for this.
2006-07-13 20:36:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by crazyhumans2 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
the same reason that there are so many untalented people in the business,political and education industry.MTV made music more about how you look as opposed to how you sound.Corporate kissa**es are reason.
2006-07-13 20:40:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Professor Riddle 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey, 2001 called, they want their topic of conversation back! They're popular cause idiots keep on buying their shitty albums.
2006-07-13 20:35:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they look good and have good enough agents to "sell" their looks which in turn sells their crappy music
2006-07-13 20:35:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋