Michael Moore does a great job at getting us hidden facts about public things. If he were president he would have to hide those facts from us. (comes with the office) I say keep him where he is, doing what he does best! I still have a movie that I want him to do first anyway. He needs to expose the corrupt so-called "justice" system. There is a lot of work for him to do yet. Don't make him become one of the corrupt let him expose them!
2006-07-13 19:01:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by just me 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
(half-jest, half serious)
That is it! You Americans have gone too far! Its bad enough you have Bush...now you want Moore?...I will be arming my country with nukes so that when said presidency occurs I will send him and your nation back to the Earth's formation (far worse than the Stone Age).
(100% seriously)
Why Moore? While I disapprove of some of Dubya's works (the sheer incompetence with which Iraq was invaded and being rebuilt in particular)...what does Micheal Moore have to offer your nation and the world? (asides from Farenheit?). Other than directing a documentary he has no semblance of leadership or charisma or even a basic grasp of the issues (Farenheit notwithstanding). He does not even have any solutions to offer (like whining about anything gets anyone anywhere?). While I will not dictate who should be your leaders...you can certaintly do so much better than Moore.
Moral of the story: You Yanks (and this also applies to all citizens of democracies, including mine) should think carefully about your choices for president and who you listen to next time.
2006-07-13 19:11:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by betterdeadthansorry 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In being a Democrat you should disagree with yet another Democrat. it is the way we adore it. seems you Republicans do too, you've such distinctive operating for workplace with such distinctive distinct suggestions each and each and every thinks is the only. i love Michael Moore because he has presented out some annoying happenings in this usa. many of the presidents lied to get around the structure. it is all an similar ingredient. all of them imagine they have been appointed God. Michael is purely making a element including his reality that Obama hasn't study the structure, i'm positive. I agree only that we ought to always no longer be in any usa with any protection rigidity for some thing see you later as our border is enormous open even as border guards are being shot at and we are being invaded each day.
2016-12-01 06:20:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He'ld be better than Bush, but so would my brother's sweaty pot-bellied pig. Oh that is Michael Moore.
Sure - why not - it's just 4 years.
Couldn't be worse than the past 6.
2006-07-13 18:55:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by jjttkbford 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michael Moore? Made for Michigan. Should stay there!
2006-07-13 18:56:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sophie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but who would be a good president? Anyone who took office would be tempted by the special interest and give in to the political pressures.....the Government is too big
2006-07-20 05:57:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by 3eleven 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely not President as he lacks any leadership qualities (then again so does Bush) but some of his views should be taken onboard by whoever is President.
2006-07-13 18:56:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tam C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Larry the Cable Guy should be the next president. Finally a candidate who can "git 'er dun".
2006-07-13 18:55:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by ahandle101 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think my Auntie Chee should be President. She's foreign but can speak better English and makes better sense than Bush.
2006-07-13 18:58:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bapboy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Aside from any ideological differences I have with the man, he lacks any significant leadership experience. I also feel he lacks the dignity and temperment of a national leader.
2006-07-13 18:54:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by timm1776 5
·
0⤊
0⤋