English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Would this work better, and make you vote for me?

America could conquer the world. Not with warring, but with such overwhelming wealth that the whole world would lick our boots to get our help for themselves. I can make a provable, tangible, graph able outline for doing this.

First someone like me would have to the President. I say that because I'm the kind of man that can't be knuckled under, I don't take you can't do that and just quit, and no matter how hard the job is I never stop short.

I’m a working class man, I came up doing body work, so I know how to fix the tangled mess others have made.

As President, this being THE most powerful position in the world, I would go completely around the Senate and the House. I would use the Executive Order and write the checks to get what needs to be done, done ASAP! The treasury is in the executive branch and Lincoln wrote checks to get things, so I would do the same.

By Executive Order, I would start with fixing the governments money problems and getting the citizens tax problems solved. Then I would stop the foreign companies that cheat the US out their share of taxes, and make a loophole free way to collect every penny they owe.

Next would come the illegals, I'd get them all registered, employed, and put them on the tax roles not us. We need the illegals paying taxes because there's just not enough Gen Xer's to pay the SS for the Boomers and Gen Xer's.

I'd make millions of high wage jobs with renewable power plant construction jobs and renewable power would be a priority. I'd build so much clean power we would have power in overabundance, and could supply the whole world with clean US made power. 1/3 of the money from the foreign power bills would be put into a fund and every head of household would get a paycheck and NO tax bill!

To continue doing this would make a book so I'm going to outline what’s to be quickly:

1st90 days by ExOrder
Establish Earth Rights for all of America like in Alaska
End income taxes;fund the Gov the right way, not on our backs
End tax paper work for citizens, not business
Balance the budget, officials are not paid till it’s done
Regular people for elected officials, no lawyers or rich
End lobbyists, take the money out of politics
Make graft illegal, mandatory jail time
Close the DOE, save the money
Take the Gov out of the schools, PTA run save money
Set Iraq’s oil to pay for the war, make an exit plan with the military
Prisoners work for jail costs, not us, save the money
Make foreign tax cheats pay, tariff goods @retail every container
Register illegals, get them on the tax roles not us
Private SS accounts, makes us millionaires, no gov access to money
After90 days by ExOrder
Build renewable power, make millions of high wage jobs
Build a fund from foreign power bills like Alaska uses to PAY us
End Nuclear power
Build electric powered roads, make millions more jobs
Thousands of jobs building electric cars&trucks
End dependence on foreign oil
Clean the polluted water with clean electric power
Return America to 50% of world’s economy


The Alaska state constitution claims common heritage rights of ownership of oil and other minerals for the people of the state as a whole. Citizen dividend checks are distributed every year in Alaska out of the interest payments to an oil royalties deposit account called the Alaska Permanent Fund (APF) created in 1976 after oil was discovered on the North Slope. The APF is a public trust fund - a diversified stock, bond and real estate portfolio - into which are deposited the oil royalties received from the corporations which extract the oil from the lands of Alaska. The first citizen dividend check from the interest of the APF was issued in 1982 and was for $1000 per every person for everyone in Alaska who had resided in the state for at least one year. Annual citizen dividends have been issued every year since then, for a total of more than $23,000 per person.

In 2003, each of the nearly 600,000 Alaska US citizens (residents of Alaska for at least one year) received a check for $1,107 from the APF. The total amount dispersed was $663.2 million. The $25 billion investment fund's core experienced stock market losses which led to the dividend's decline this past year compared to the several previous years. The amount was $433 less, a 28 percent drop from the 2002 pay out of $1,540, and a 44 percent decrease from the all-time high of $1,964 in year 2000. The amount changes based on a five-year average of APF investment income derived from the bonds, stock dividends, real estate and other investments.

Alaska relies on oil for about 80 percent of its revenue and has no sales or income tax. Alaska state government is mandated to invest 25% of its oil revenue into the APF while the other 75% of oil royalty revenue is dispersed to other government funds to finance education, infrastructure and social services. If 100% of Alaska's oil royalties had been deposited into the APF, it is conceivable that the CD this year could have been about $4,400 or $17,600 for a family of four. But then there would have been no funds for roads, education and other public services and no funds available to run the state legislature - a libertarian dream fulfillment or a social and economic disaster, which one we will never know. If state services were to have been maintained while 100% of oil royalties were deposited in the APF, there would of course have been the need for income, sales and other taxes on wages and production.

Alaska uses Earth Rights to pay about $1000 p/yr and not tax their residents. With all 50 states my fed gov could pay $50,000 p/yr, NO TAXES, and fund the gov!

The foreign tax money, the illegals taxes, and earthrights money pays all the gov expenses, funds the military better than now, and pays down the debt with NO deficit.

The Renewable power fund would pay what I call a National Income Program, and when the fund matures in about 30 years, would pay about another $50,000 p/yr.

So $50,000 p/yr from the Earth Rights and NO taxes. Millions of high wage power plant construction jobs, we would need to build 5000 power plants just to start, and build for many years to come.

Then millions more jobs to build new electric powered roads to use the clean power. Thousands of jobs to build electric cars and trucks.

Then comes the other $50,000 p/yr from the National Income Program all with no taxes. And oil dependence ends!

Then the private SS account would have about a $1,000,000 in it when you retire. The rich make fortunes by building money in funds just this same way, so what works for the rich will for the nation.

This builds America to be 300,000,000 millionaires. The money would be pasted to your Aires and NO TAXES. Each generation would be richer than the last. Soon newborns would be born millionaires, and the system would continue to multiply their wealth for each next generation.

America would be so wealthy that soon we would be the envy of the world, and people from around the world would lick our boots for us to help them get where we would be. America rules the world with wealth, not war.

With stable power comes jobs, with jobs comes prosperity. Prosperity makes life comfortable, with comfort comes contentment. Contentment would bring peace, and war would be a thing of the past. If someone for some strange reason wanted start a war we could just stop beaming their power.

I take it you know electric power can be beamed on a microwave inside a laser beam to a satellite and put anywhere it's needed on the earth! So cut the beam and no power. It's hard to fight a war with no lights or power. America controls the power!

The renewable power is fuel-less so it's cheap clean power! It’ without the inflation of fuel costs, so the price would remain stable.

Would you vote for me to be the President?

2006-07-13 20:42:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Perhaps....but, are you assuming also, that the majority (Joe Ordinary etc) are of reasonable enough intelligence, wisdom, and maturity to make the right choices? Many times people make choices based on what they WANT.... and not necessarily what they NEED or what is best for all. You do also realize that the same - type mentality of people that faithfully watch, or participate on shows like JERRY SPRINGER, Trailer park boys, etc. or are out here on yahoo questions, for that matter. will also have some CONTROL in votes. That in itself could be pretty scarry. That just might put too much power in the hands of Mental Midgets. That in effect, is why the constitution was written.

2006-07-13 18:18:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely not - democracy should be limited.

Get rid of Senate elections altogether - time for the wise and educated to run things - keep the House as is except

ban lobbying especially for campaign debt payoffs.

Who wins elections? Not the inteligent - not the wise - people that are popular - same popular morons you remember from high school that didn't study, but brushed their hair and scored touchdowns. Not a good way to run the country.

2006-07-13 18:50:48 · answer #3 · answered by jjttkbford 4 · 0 0

an similar those who voted for the perfect Anti-American Socialists: Clinton Kennedy FDR humorous, it type of feels that when a Republican president screws issues up, it takes an Anti-American socialist to freshen up their mess and save the rustic. Clinton - wiped clean up the monetary mess left by technique of Bush I Kennedy - Stared down the Ruskies and wiped clean up the Cuban mess left by technique of Ike. FDR - wiped clean up the monetary ruin led to by technique of Hoover and then kept the international from the Axis powers.

2016-12-01 06:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by kirchoff 3 · 0 0

uh... the majority elected Bush... twice... we would probably be a third world country in about a week if that happened...

then everyone would complain "why did you let us make our own decisions... you knew we didn't know what we were talking about"..

2006-07-13 18:03:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no, because the majority is not always right, and the majority of the people wouldn't have a clear understanding of everything involved

2006-07-13 17:57:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the supreme court would throw out his process because some people can't/won't/don't have computers. Therefore they would be disenfranchised

2006-07-13 17:59:29 · answer #7 · answered by Norman 7 · 0 0

Might , would need to hear more .

2006-07-13 18:35:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers