English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the only excuse yall had for not supporting taking out a dictaor murderer gets blown to heck and yall just ignore it and claim we shouldnt be there theres no WMDs wake up!!

2006-07-13 17:43:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

Because they think if they keep repeating their same old mantra "George Bush lied" then it will eventually become true.

Denying the truth does not make it any less true.

Of course that never stopped a liberal from making a fool of themselves.

2006-07-13 18:57:50 · answer #1 · answered by jakobmccandles 2 · 0 1

I know all about it, but something you folks seem to not know is that something called the "Duelfer Report" by our government states that these are all weapons from before 1992 and do not indicate a reconstituted weapons program, it even says that these are not the weapons we are looking for. Look it up, I did because I heard so much about it. Also the 500 shells are filled with mustard gas that's so old it does'nt work, although there are a few shells of sarin that are capable of killing people in the stockpile. If you really think we started this war over mustard gas that does'nt even work anymore, than maybe you should look into your belief system. Also, just what hapenned to the rest of the weapons, you know, the anthrax, smallpox, VX nerve gas, and all that other stuff. If they were there, what the hell hapenned to them, this is a very legitimate question that nobody seems to ask, are they in Syria, as some conspiracy theorists claim, although this claim has already been debunked, people still stand by it as if it were truth, if it is true, is'nt that really bad, that they are in a country that has more links to terrorism than Iraq. I think we can both agree that the 500 shells of inert 14 year old mustard gas is not what everybody was talking about prior to the war, and by everybody I mean from the first Bush, to Clinton, down to the second Bush, just where are these weapons, seriously, that is a valid security risk, if people don't know where these weapons are then the whole point of this war is in the toilet. Where are these weapons, why have we not found them, ask yourself this and ask your peers this, if they are buried in the desert somewhere, why would'nt the Iraqi government just hand them out to terrorists and inssurgents, why because we might put them out of power? If you really care for your troops, and really believe the weapons were there, then try to find out where they are, that is the question of the decade and you really just can't sweep that under the rug.

2006-07-14 01:40:22 · answer #2 · answered by JoeThatUKnow 3 · 0 0

Didn't happen. Didn't you see the cover of Time Magazine, "We (Bush Administration) Were All Wrong."

Besides the real issue is not whether Iraq had weapons (what country doesn't - are we going to attack all other nations with weapons - how does that logic work in reverse) but the erroneous claim that Iraq was a threat to the U.S. That was the greater lie - the WMDs claim means nothing without putting it in the context of the bigger lie.

2006-07-14 01:07:44 · answer #3 · answered by HelloKitty 3 · 0 0

Stop trying to distort the facts just to support your own cause-that's what Bush did to get us in this war in the first place. These so-called WMDs were ANCIENT and USELESS and were not at all the "ready-2-destroy-humanity" WMDs Bush lead us to believe. These weapons were completely unable to be used as an act of terrorism. WHY DON'T U STOP LYING TO YOURSELF AND GET A CLUE!!!

2006-07-14 00:59:34 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Charles 3 · 0 0

They found 500 mustard gas and sarin nerve gas shells held over from the Iran-Iraq conflict. Nobody's flipping out about it because:
1)They're not the hundreds of liters of biological weapons or hundreds of tons of chemical weapons we were told the administration had concrete, irrefutable proof of
2)They're fvcking useless as WMDs. Go read the FOXnews article online, it says it right there straight from the DoD.

2006-07-14 00:48:43 · answer #5 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0 0

I still have not heard of any WMD found? When and where? I don't think I missed anything. I think our drug labs stood a better chance of having a WMD than Iraq.

2006-07-14 01:22:54 · answer #6 · answered by Don K 5 · 0 0

Duh most people know they found weapons over there. What happened to the WMD thats supposed to produce the smokeing mushroom cloud that Condi rice told the whole world as the reason for going in. Well I went to know where are the smokeing mushroom cloud producing WMDs? Can anybody answer that?

2006-07-15 00:16:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

... oi... I guess I'm going to have to do this again, but I'm going to make it quick...

of course they had WMD overall... but 99 percent of the time everyone is talking about the WMD that Bush said they had, which if you were paying attention, were the ones manufactured post-gulf war...

the one's they found were clearly pre-gulf war, thus not part of the conservatives reasons for going to war... the White House and DOD admitted this as well...

welcome to the actual conversation... but I doubt you care about the facts of the situation..

2006-07-14 00:48:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because it did not happen. If it REALLY had, poor old dumbass dubya would be showing his smug face all over the planet with a great big "I told ya so" but he isn't because he LIED and killed 2500+ GREAT soldiers.


It is totally apparent from the lack of responses from the right that you're full of crap even THEY cannot swallow. Think you better let this one go.

2006-07-14 00:47:11 · answer #9 · answered by Who cares 5 · 0 0

Wake Up!!

You are having a dream Bubba. It did not happen!

2006-07-14 01:27:03 · answer #10 · answered by MSJP 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers