Electrostatic charge due to friction is the result of electrons transfer. Why not a transfer of protons ?

Answer 1

Protons reside in the atom's nucleus and are held together by whats called the Strong Force. This is many times more powerful than the electromagnetic force. Also, protons weight about 1800 times more than electrons, but have the same charge. Plus, protons are within an atom while electrons are on the outside of the atom. They are more loosely held together.

Answer 2

Electrons are negatively charged. The electrostatic discharge occurs because the negatively charged cloud of free electrons around a doorknob, say, is drawn towards your finger after you've shuffled your feet on the rug. Lightning works the same way. Although an atom may be ionized, the proton is still an atom, it is still surrounded by electrons in their various shells around the proton. Also, you have to consider the weight of the proton. An electron is a mere wisp of energy -- a proton has mass. What's going to be easier to attract by some oppositely charged field?

Answer 3

u cant snatch out the protons without removing the electrons as well, because where protons can go electrons can definitely go owing to their lighter weight. so u end up removing the whole atom which cannot be done as in solids, atoms are bound to each other by strong intermolecular forces. however electrons are lighter particles orbiting in the extra-nuclear space and and can be removed by friction which involves transfer of charge and electrons are the lighter charge carriers. does this answer ur question?

Answer 4

Protons are bound up in the nucleus of the atom with neutrons and don't move around like the much lighter electrons.

Answer 5

A value is a large result. There are purely this style of large style of electrons that ought to exist in each and each orbit or polarity. The previous expression that oppossites charm to is genuine because they pull on one yet another like an inelastic collision. They leap off one yet another even if the pull in oppossite guidelines isn't as consistent, so that they arrive lower back at the same time. That and nuetrons do not have a cost.

Answer 6

Think about the bonding energy. How much energy would it take to ionize an electron versus removing a proton from the nucleus?

The amount of energy required to ionize is rather small in comparison to removing the proton.

eV versus MeV

Answer 7

Electrons are very mobile and easily stripped from an atom (called ionization).

Aside from hydrogen it is pretty hard to strip all the electrons off an atom to expose the proton - except in a linear accelerator/collider (atom smasher).

Answer 8

Protons are in the nucleus of the atom. It cant be removed that easily. But electrons are present outside the nucleus constantly in motion.

Answer 9

Based on what I know, electrons are easily excited to different energy levels upon hit by incident photons. Protons are bonded by the zero charge neutrons.

Answer 10

because protons are held strongly to the nucleus of an atom while electrons are held losely orbiting the nucleus. an electron doesnt take much to move from one atom to another. in addition electrons weigh less than protons or neutrons. it takes less force to shift the electrons out of their orbit.