2006-07-13 15:51:57 · 9 answers · asked by Joseph H 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
No Oil involved
2006-07-13 15:53:44 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The irony of the placement is that the British government have been actively finding for a thank you to grant the Falklands to Argentina till they invaded in 1982. there replaced into even an attempt to come again to agreements on mineral rights and accomplish cooperation interior the mid ninety's. i'm no longer conscious that there have been any nearby human beings on the islands earlier to the Europeans arriving - no longer something skill that any have been killed to learn administration. The Europeans did no longer initially wrest administration of the islands from the Argentinians in some conflict whilst they usual their preliminary settlements. finally, while you're born in a u . s . - then that u . s . is your place. In a democracy, functional human beings do no longer seek for to disclaim the rights of 2d or third era immigrants - we are saying that they have as plenty precise to be in a u . s . as the different individual who replaced into born there; they have only as plenty say over how that u . s . is controlled. for this reason, the main suitable say as to what happens to the islands could lie with its inhabitants. If something, the Falklands could seek for to be an self sustaining u . s ., and not taken care of as a pawn in some game. somewhat, if there is Oil interior the waters around the islands, they are able to be able to administration particularly right without Britain or Argentina.
2016-12-10 06:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by civil 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England did not want to seem weak by asking for US assistance. Projecting power 9,000 miles away isn't easy, and they did a good job.
2006-07-13 15:57:05 · answer #3 · answered by szydkids 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great Britain didn't need any help. It was easy for them because they are very powerful. If they needed us we would have been there no matter who was president. Long live the Queen!!!
2006-07-13 15:56:56 · answer #4 · answered by sumrtanman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We're not worried about no falkland sheep.
2006-07-13 15:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We were not involved in combat, but we provided satellite intel and we resupplied their air and naval forces.
2006-07-13 16:03:58 · answer #6 · answered by Otis F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We wasn't neutral, we supported GB.
2006-07-20 05:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by CottonPatch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hay man..... We though you guys could handle it.
2006-07-13 15:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
we gave intel to the brits...i know i was there.
2006-07-13 15:53:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋