Bill O'Reilly (on the Factor tonight) said that the crisis between Hezballah and Israel, coupled with other troubles in the Middle East, is the start of WW III.......just wondered if people agree with this statement. Remember, too, that our eyes are on North Korea and China......worrisome times?
2006-07-13 15:21:20 · 12 answers · asked by justme 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Troublesome times are here, filling our hearts with fear. Those are the words from a gospel song. And, yes, this is probably the beginning of the final world war, because once this war begins, nukes will be fired and the end of time will fast approach. Nuclear war is described well in Revelation and this will be the end of all things. Make your peace.
2006-07-13 15:27:52 · answer #1 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
According to Bush, the WWIII started on 9/11/01. I was thinking this yesterday, before O'Reilly, and I don't think the US will be pulled too deep into the Mid East conflict as of now. We're stretched so thin with two conflicts (w/ a military designed for one) that unless N Korea/Iran start w/ nuclear war we won't get involved.
Unfortunately, Israel is pretty much in constant combat.
I'd say make that part of the world completely soverign and allow all religions to pray there. This divide/conquer mentality will not stop until then.
2006-07-13 15:27:25 · answer #2 · answered by Fosco33 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think WW lll will start in the middle east, unless more nations send military units there. There is not enough reason to go over there anymore. I would be more worried about N. Korea and China, but I think N. Korea is just feeling left out and wouldn't really start anything because they would be decimated by the U.S. and any other nation that felt threatened.
2006-07-13 15:27:00 · answer #3 · answered by xlwass 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we've been in World War III since September 11, to tell you the truth. Glenn Beck had an interesting thing on his TV show tonight, talking to the guy whom Syriana was based upon. We're definitely in the middle of a REAL, honest-to-goodness World War, whether anyone wants to admit it or not.
2006-07-13 15:36:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
he's just jumping to conclusions like he always does.
The problems in the middle east have been constant and have been going on for the past 5,000 years.
There will be no World War because of this.
2006-07-13 15:24:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
appeared on the midsection East difficulty those days with Israel and Lebanon? Bush ought to in no way visit conflict with Syria no matter if or not they were to nuke the U. S. because they are kin acquaintances and kiss as a lot as one yet another - get the image? because Bush is a kill-loopy psychopath, finally we are going to land up in Iran and/or North Korea. and that i extremely do imagine his wanting to work out American squaddies die is admirable because he did such an magnificent interest of serving in the course of the VietNam conflict. what number lives did he shop or VietNamese did he kill even as in the Air nationwide guard? His militia record to assert the least is exemplary and he's unquestionably a real patriot. the foremost to the finished difficulty is Bush and what that fool comes to a call to do. Even he - and it is giving him credit for brains and that i comprehend it really is a stretch - is conscious we are able to not have adequate money to get China mad at us because we owe them a lot money its ridiculous. All it ought to take to bankrupt the country is for them to call in all their expenditures. the faster Bush and his cronies comprehend the in common words thanks to attain a lengthy-lasting piece in this international is through international kin individuals, the extra valuable off we are going to be. notwithstanding, his refusal to even sit with North Korea till its on HIS words is in common words tending to make the issue even extra risky. Ditto Iran. the foremost to the finished difficulty immediately although lies with what occurs between Israel and the different countries in the midsection East. Its purely now commencing to blow up and we haven't considered the biggest explosion yet. With any type of success, international conflict III is purely not starting up, yet i'd not carry my breath - it feels like it will be purely around the nook.
2016-11-02 00:49:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, but I feel like we are in the 2nd depression. Prices are inflated, the fighting shows no sign of stopping, it is a war that I may not live to see the end of and that scares me.
2006-07-13 15:25:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually asked the same question earlier but I see it is being asked alot. I would like to think that the world could resolve the issues you mentioned but honestly, I can't see that happening.
2006-07-13 15:28:23 · answer #8 · answered by daniel.brillet 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, but if we do get WWIII it will start in the Middle East
2006-07-13 16:08:51 · answer #9 · answered by Adios 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
forgot the indian subcontinent?india and pakistan both have nukes and are not the best of friends.if they fight then....i hope it does not happen.yes ww3 may have started but i hope that it does not develop further
2006-07-13 16:09:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋