Or will you undermind them again in WW3?
2006-07-13 14:54:45 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
you're asking liberals if they will support our troops?!?!?!?! to them if you support troops you support a war, no difference between the two, they're freakin liberals man they'll tell you what you want to hear and turn around and do a 180 and tell the opposite to the people whose opinion differs from yours.
2006-07-13 14:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by shellmybell15 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1.) if there is a world war 3, were all going to die.
2.) if there is a legitimite reason to invade Iran and Syria then i will of course support our troops
3.) i support our troops now because i dont want any more of them to be killed, but i do not support the reason they are in iraq.
4.) there is no excuse to be invading syria and iran right now, both are too far away from producing technology to truly harm us.
5.) North Korea is the real threat right now with only their missile system standing between them and destroying half the country.
2006-07-13 15:03:27 · answer #2 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the answer is in basic terms, No. those who help invading Iran truly use the regularly happening scare methods such as the Iraq justification, it style of feels that at present's propaganda claims the favor to bypass to warfare with Iran is to guard us from the Iranian Nuclear possibility.....isn't that what replaced into suggested about Iraq? yet what possibility? Iran would not have any atom bombs, neither did Iraq, and Iran would not have any infrastructure to construct one, and starting up the position they're at this second of their nuclear marketplace, they could not have any bomb interior the subsequent 6-7 years - inspite of in the experience that they attempt to construct this style of weapon. Which the IAEA says isn't the most concentration of the Iranian nuclear coverage right now. keep in mind that when us of a organizations were construction Iran's Nuclear marketplace, it replaced into all AOK. The question is, what and who will make the most of a warfare with Iran? i have self belief it will be an similar bunch it somewhat is persevering with to make the most of Iraq. as long as Bush and the lads can get patriotic people to get riled up from their propaganda campaign, they can assume an ecosystem which will allow us to work out a repeat of Iraq.
2016-12-10 09:17:13 · answer #3 · answered by pfeifer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you ready to be drafted into the army to fight beside them, then? war with syria and iran will easily require 3x more standing army troops than we now have at our (your cavalierly casual) disposal. you might want to grab hold of all your we-can-solve-our-problems-with missiles friends to go along with you. liberals do not undermine our troops. the liberals i know show a strong solidarity with our troops. there is a difference between support for our troops and support for the Iraqi war policy, which is separate from the war on terrorism. i think don rumsfeld and dick cheney do more to undermine the well being of our military than any of us (evil liberals in our wildest evilest dreams) could ever manage.
2006-07-13 15:20:10 · answer #4 · answered by emptiedfull 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be easier do deal with the real threats of Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and N. Korea if were were not wasting with non-threats like Iraq.
2006-07-13 15:14:58 · answer #5 · answered by arvis3 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a lib, not by a long shot. Iran should have been our 1st target, after 9/11, after the fatwa against Salon Rushdie, after the hostage crisis, after the oil fields were nationalized... Clobber these bastards!
2006-07-13 15:05:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I vow to defend America to the death. One catch though, it's hard for me to invade another country and think I'm on a defensive mission. As soon as we are invaded, I'll be right there on the front, wherever it is(within the continental United States).
2006-07-13 15:05:56 · answer #7 · answered by Derek D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on which lies we are told to go to war against Syria and Iran.
2006-07-13 15:03:51 · answer #8 · answered by Professor Chaos386 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once again, Neo-clown, head back up your keester hole before you suffocate on the air of normal people. If we're extinct, it don't matter who we supported, what we did or why we did it. Go stand in an xray for an hour and see the results.
2006-07-13 15:15:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't have to support the mission to support the toops. I guess we stupid Libs like our soilders...you know....alive. And we get upset when they die for oil money and lies. Since the cogs in your head don't spin that fast...we'll give you a break for being so un-patriotic and not supporting freedom of expression.
2006-07-13 15:04:29 · answer #10 · answered by Franklin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋