Is this possible, or is the person's choices to blame?
2006-07-13 14:24:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
not the choices i dont think.....theres a good book that explains this called "fooled by randomness" that probly everyone should read ... it takes the "oh poor me why am i a victim of life" perception out of everything..not just financial markets like the title implies
2006-07-13 14:28:28 · answer #1 · answered by Jilm_Jones 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This means the person got screwed but no one's going to take the responsibility (read blame) for it.
2006-07-13 21:28:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a very redundant way of saying "victim". When was there ever a "fortunate victim" or a "victim without circumstance"?
2006-07-15 04:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one to blame here.
unfortunate = not lucky / bad luck
victim = target / prey
circumstance = event / happenstance
'an unlucky even occurred to a happless target.'
2006-07-13 21:29:59 · answer #4 · answered by Poncho Rio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it means that someone got screwed up and he doesn't know who's to blame (his self or other people).
2006-07-13 21:30:58 · answer #5 · answered by Liz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not if its unfortunate
2006-07-13 21:28:32 · answer #6 · answered by jojo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋