Our company uses a database program that runs on SQL server. I use Access2002 and run some basic queries on the database to retrieve a list of data. We connect to all of this via a Citrix connection. Periodically users are experiencing very bad slowness issues, lockups, etc. When I contacted the company about it they said it is because I am using Access and my queries lock the tables and that cause other users who are actually in the program to experience their problems. The query I run just takes about a second or two to display the data. They said even if the query is completed, as long as it remains open it will keep those tables locked. Does this sound likely? If so, how do I make Access queries not lock the data. If it does not sound like the case to you, do you have any suggestions on a reputable site that may contain some facts to back that up. Unless I can start pointing them to prove that they may be wrong, they will never fix the problem and put the blame on my queries.
2006-07-13
13:49:41
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Tenn_Tazz26
2
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Programming & Design
I don't have access to the actual SQL server management console. The way it works is we connect to the software using a Citrix server connection. When we connect, the only thing we have access to is an icon to connect to their actual software, which is a SQL server based database. Since I also pay a license fee to run Access2002 I also have an icon for Access. When I use Access to be able to run queries and create reports, I simply link to the SQL database they have in the Machine Datasource. To my knowledge I should only have read access using Access because I cannot physically change any of the data that resides in the table. I have to use their actual software to make changes. The company told me that they felt the slowness was because they said my queries are locking the tables and supposedly they must have used the SQL manager to determine this. If I am supposed to only be read only when using Access, how do I make it prevent locking in the method I described?
2006-07-14
02:06:19 ·
update #1