English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They post there videos on Al-Jezerra regularly and point blank tell you that it is our Al-Quaeda militia that is responsible for this attack.The ignorance enveloping an American mind to say that Al-Quaeda and Iraq have nothing to do with each other only validates my belief that some people are just plain full of ****. Only an anti-bush candidate would stoop to such silly comments in order to bash the president.

2006-07-13 13:49:23 · 10 answers · asked by isaac a 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Every time Al-Qaeda claims an attack in Iraq they validate what Bush said "We have to crush the terrorists where they originate, so as to make American citizens safer."
And remember, it’s our soldiers putting they’re lives on the line everyday that you even have the right to ***** and whine about the war. Why don’t you put down your snot laden hankies and grab your nuts, and thank god for another day that this war has brought you a step closer to long term safety and stability. Ensuring that you can go to Starbucks during your brunch everyday and ***** about it for years and years to come without being interrupted by suicide bombers that claim to be peaceful right before they cut your head off and blow your Starbucks coffee table into little smoldering pieces .

2006-07-13 13:50:04 · update #1

dseyoyo-Al-queda is not a threat to anyone????! Do I even need to dignify that with a response.no, I really dont need to.Un fortunantly the thickness of your skull leaves no room left for a human brain.So what would be the use.

2006-07-13 14:04:03 · update #2

so, saying that we are in Iraq to fight terror is a bit like leaving a trail of food from an ant hill into your kitchen, and then saying that there are ants there...

Honey the freedom of the U.S is the ant trail.though you may be smart for a retard there is a gaping hole in your theory.How many U.S. soldiers were in Iraq before 9/11? OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.Get it???? probably not. Ill just leave you alone now and let you get back to sifting through and M@M pile to sort out the W's. retard!

2006-07-13 14:09:45 · update #3

THE FORMER IRAQI REGIME OF Saddam Hussein trained thousands of radical Islamic terrorists from the region at camps in Iraq over the four years immediately preceding the U.S. invasion, according to documents and photographs recovered by the U.S. military in postwar Iraq. The existence and character of these documents has been confirmed to THE WEEKLY STANDARD by eleven U.S. government officials.

The secret training took place primarily at three camps--in Samarra, Ramadi, and Salman Pak--and was directed by elite Iraqi military units. Interviews by U.S. government interrogators with Iraqi regime officials and military leaders corroborate the documentary evidence. Many of the fighters were drawn from terrorist groups in northern Africa with close ties to al Qaeda, chief among them Algeria's GSPC and the Sudanese Islamic Army. Some 2,000 terrorists were trained at these Iraqi camps each year from 1999 to 2002, putting the total number at or above 8,000.

2006-07-13 20:55:39 · update #4

10 answers

I agree with your point 100 percent. This is the hate Bush agenda. Liberals, who are the ones making these statements do so because Alot of them share a common characteristic,.
Before I continue , just look at the United Nations. You have Kim Jong Mentally ill,firing missles out across the ocean ( Yeah, I know they were junk) Was there any condemnation from the United Nations for this? Not that I have heard. If I am wrong, correct me. I am reasonable. Now that Israel defends itself, which it has the right to do, against thug governments , it is condemned as using excessive force. The point?
This is how the enemy operates. You know the principle of how this works. I am talking about the evil in some peoples hearts.If people love someone, they are going to say.Hes a generous man. If they hate him, they will accuse him of being a gullible fool who threw his money away.
If he is loved and drinks,usually regardless of how much, he will be a good guy. he will be considered okay. If he drinks , even the slightest amount, and is despised, he will be accused of being a useless drunk.
I could go on, but I know you are smart enough to know my point. You have seen this yourself with our news media.
These are tactics used by enemys of America. I am accusing the Media.(ABC) ( NBC) (CBS) of these tactics. The New York Times, etc. This scum does everything in it power to undermine Our country. Why?, well most of us know why. They are such smart educated sophisticated people. (Where I live, we call these people educated idiots)
You liberals who worship these fools, Feel free to bow down and worship. Celebrate stupidity.Celebrate your own doom. You would be nothing but a dead man, were it not for the people who have some common sense.You don't recognize that point, because you are a fool.
Your ideas can be proven wrong. History proves you wrong. But , you will not give a damn about history, or facts. Why?
You believe what you want to believe. This is why conservative talk radio, kicks your liberal *** constantly. This is also why your flunky liberal talk radio can't stay on the air. People have a built in BS detector. They know when they are being lied too. Most do anyway. , except the people who are anxious for lies, Like you. So go live in your fantasy world.Comfort yourself with lies.

2006-07-13 15:25:27 · answer #1 · answered by zzz 2 · 0 0

Maybe someone who knows something different?
Only thing I know you cant believe everything the US media states, its very biased. Was it not the White house staff that stated the Iraninan nation had weapons of "mass destruction" and that they had "proof" that we need to go in there and invade these "terrorists?!" Then about a month+ ago CNN has an expose on how the White house created lies and a cover up on those "weapons" in order to do what they wanted to do which was invade a foreign land. If a person/nation wants to clean up a country maybe the US should start with its own. The bible states how can I tell my brother remove the splinter that is in your eye if you do not see the plank that is in your own eye. The US has crooks in the white house, congress and government. Why do you think it is well known that there is no such thing as an "honest politician." You think that a God who sits high is going to continue sitting idlely by while they have turned their backs on him? This country was founded by "faith." Now because they want to maintain an illusion of rightousness, judgement has been set. Think its funny how a typoon can hit the same place twice? Look at New Orleans, that voodoo infested city of debachery. What is left. Rebuild? The US must be out of their minds. It was struck t w i c e. Flooding? In places that it usually never occurred. Fires? Calif. I am remined of a time when God open the floodgates of heaven and sealed up the openings of the earth and flooded for 40 days and nites. Was that not concidered a natural disastor? You are being concerned for the wrong things. Be concerned about the signs of the times. When judgement will be applied. How will you stand before a just God. Wailing about Al-Quaeda?

2006-07-13 21:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by agcgartner 6 · 0 0

For the record, Sadaam Hussien is a mass-murderer and an evil man, but he is not a radical Muslim. Although the majority of Iraqi citizens are Muslim, the government of Iraq has always been secular. This, specifically, is WHY Al-Queda did not operate in Iraq pre-invasion. Sadaam feared Al-Queda because they are governed by religious leaders. Not being a recognized cleric himself, he could not control them. As a rule, Al-Queda doesn't look favorably on Muslims who proscribe to secular law rather than religious law, and they represented a threat to Sadaam's power. It's been well documented that he actively worked to curtail Al-Queda's activities and keep them OUT of Iraq.

Whether or not Al-Queda has cells operating in Iraq NOW is open for debate. The vast majority of insurgents in Iraq are not Iraqi's. They travel into the country to attack US forces.

2006-07-13 21:35:10 · answer #3 · answered by marbledog 6 · 0 0

they are, but again you have most likely missed the point of what someone was saying... they weren't there to any real degree, before we were there...

so, saying that we are in Iraq to fight terror is a bit like leaving a trail of food from an ant hill into your kitchen, and then saying that there are ants there... and saying that you should have called an exterminator last week... the ants weren't there last week...

WHY DON'T YOU TRY TO ACTUALLY LEARN WHO CAUSED 9-11 AND WHERE THEY HAVE BASES... then you will see, we're not doing much about terror or those that attacked us.. why don't you care about those people?

you can start with the 9-11 report, which was filed by the government and is sold at most bookstores and go from there...

NICE... ALL YOU HAVE LEFT ARE INSULTS SINCE YOU NEVER HAD ANY FACTS TO BEGIN WITH... GOOD JOB...

2006-07-13 21:04:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

for one thing i believe ur right...al-quaida is in almost every country with a muslim population...the question is if they pose a threat to us? the answer i believe is a resounding "very little"...definitely not enough to justify over-running a country or killing 10s' of thousands of iraqis. the truth i believe, is that alquaida is a CIA asset, and the real reason we are in iraq and afganistan is an economic/oil reason and a quest for global domination and power. Terrorist are no more a threat today than they were 50 years ago...definitely not a reason to justify a war or a tearing down of our rights.

2006-07-13 20:59:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just the "hate Bush at any cost" ignorance. It's easy to do, because all you have to do is nothing to be uninformed and gutless.
Geeze...the terrorists were in Florida, but not in a radical Islamist country like the tyrant run Iraq?
Foolish Liberals have to wait until a radical with a bomb strapped to them gets on a bus with THEIR child on it to wake up.....but alas...then they will blame Bush for not doing enough. You know i'm right.

2006-07-13 21:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are in Iraq - NOW. They weren't before the war and the only proven person to have been in Iraq was in Kurdish controlled territory in the north - not in Baghdad.

It's been proven over and over again.

2006-07-13 21:05:39 · answer #7 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 0 0

what are you talking about? Im an anti-Bush guy but I do believe that Al-Quaeda and Iraq have a lot to do with each other

2006-07-13 20:54:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You made a good point. It's obvious that Iraq was a threat to us, and I do not understand why people cannot see that.

2006-07-13 20:55:52 · answer #9 · answered by Appono Astos 5 · 0 0

Here we go again. There was no alQ. in Iraq when Hussein was in power, they are now the kings of the land , cortesy of the invasion

2006-07-13 20:56:14 · answer #10 · answered by class4 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers