Was Napoleon Bonaparte a effective leader?

Answer 1

Well, "an" effective leader depends on many things. Since I love history so much, I recall that even as a youngster, he was exposed to military thinking and responding. That is always an asset. Futhermore, he had a high opinion of himself - and that works for you in some ways - when you have to rally men together to fight- you'd better be confident in yourself, else, men see your weakness and want to overthrow you. Napoleon has this quality. He enjoyed fighting and winning and when he won, the people loved him, when the people got tired of fighting and wanted to sign peace treaties among themselves, he grew upset. Like most leaders, when you offend them, they come out fighting. Napoleon went after Russia, eventually leaving Moscow, where he had 500,000 men, came back to France with 20,000. After that, his little 'empire' fell apart. The people grew tired of him and eventually bannished him from France - but like the true 'leader' he was - he didn't stay. He still had friends and marched his little butt right back to France. He tried to make peace, but they weren't having it. He was eventually exiled again in a small island (St Helena) where he eventually died. An effective leader - when leaders offer good things to and for their people and keep other enemies away, protecting their ports, but constantly attempting to seek peace and prosperity for all men, effectiveness is acomplished - but we know in truth, that each man's effectiveness depends on the people who love him vs the people who hate him. There is always a division. When the wheel is turning in your favor, you're effective. When the wheel starts to squeak and show signs of wear and breakage - you're ineffective and have a very short time to get that wheel back on the road - else you're gone.

Answer 2

He replaced into the main considerable chief. enable's assessment your checklist and notice in the event that they practice to Napoleon. good leaders are committed - Napoleon replaced into between the main committed adult adult males in background, constantly working as tricky or harder than his troops. He progressed hemorrhoids later in life, so he had hassle snoozing. for this reason, he stayed up long hours making plans for conflict. good leaders be conscious of they don't be conscious of each and every thing - Hmmmm. i did no longer in my opinion be conscious of the guy, needless to say, yet Napoleon concept he knew each and every thing. the component is, whilst it got here to war, he virtually did. besides the undeniable fact that, he replaced into speedy to take care of his own own understanding and have been given annoyed if everyone puzzled him. So i think of Napoleon flunks this area. good leaders are open to alter - no longer somewhat. Napoleon needed it his way or no way. good leaders take advice from those around him - Napoleon concept he knew all of it, so i could flunk him right here, as properly. good leaders take unfavourable aspects - He took unfavourable aspects extensive-unfold. For him, getting up interior the morning replaced right into a danger, pondering how a lot of human beings needed him lifeless. So, Napoleon flunks alot of issues on your checklist, yet i could nonetheless say he replaced right into a great chief as a results of fact his human beings enjoyed him to the very end and accompanied him, maximum of them to their deaths.

Answer 3

Any leader that has to go to war was NOT an effective leader.

Answer 4

yyyyyyyessss, not many people have armies, have you noticed?