English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is it just me or is this movie just another big waist of hollywoods money??

2006-07-13 11:27:20 · 15 answers · asked by Hellion 4 in Entertainment & Music Movies

15 answers

What? You think that a movie about snakes on a plane could be stupid? Naa, it can't be, well come to think of it I think it is gonna be the worst movie ever!!!!!!
I luv pudding!!!!!!

2006-07-13 12:16:42 · answer #1 · answered by Hannah 3 · 5 3

I'm a little confused by this movie, I didn't really know what it was about, I hadn't seen previews of it until recently. When I heard people talk about, I thought it was some comedy movie, but then I saw the previews yesterday and it's supposed to be a serious movie right? I mean, it doesn't seem serious, but I guess it's supposed to be. Pretty weird. It seems like a pretty stupid idea, but I'm still pretty confused about it. How did these snakes get on the plane? Can't people just step on their heads? Are they mutant snakes? Are they trying to take over the plane? Very interesting.

2006-07-14 01:34:47 · answer #2 · answered by sgrjackson1 5 · 0 0

It does but yet it doesnt, what im saying is that hollywood is running out of ideas i mean look at all the crap there releasing, nothing but friggin remakes, sequels, or movies based on tv shows or video games. im not saying all of these are bad but its actually one of the only ideas hollywood has actually put originallity and dare i say smarts, not that im saying the whole movie is smart, but ur in a airplane thousands of miles from help and snakes get on board. i dont see how that is possible but it works, also snakes are undetecable through metal detecters. that is just my thought though

2006-07-13 11:36:07 · answer #3 · answered by kevin_smith_fan 2 · 0 0

As long as people continue to go see stupid movies, Hollywood will continue to make them.

The problem isn't with Hollywood, they are appealing to demand. The problem is that people are willing to pay $8 each to sit in a theater and stare at the most mind-numbingly bad garbage for 2 hours.

Don't curse Hollywood, curse the idiots who keep lowering the bar.

2006-07-13 11:32:48 · answer #4 · answered by jkk109 4 · 0 0

It's Samuel L Jackson ... I can think of worse movies to see than Snakes on a Plane with worse actors .... I'm thinking ... Little Man.

2006-07-13 11:33:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

it actually looks kind of good to my eyes. I just keep wondering over and over "How do the snakes get on a plane? Why is Samuel L. Jackson in this movie? WHY IS HE STILL BALD!?"

2006-07-13 11:58:57 · answer #6 · answered by J 2 · 0 0

you know-everytime they show the preview when I see a movie everybody jumps up and cheers and applauds in the theatre, it may be dumb and a dumb name but the concept makes it out to be fun "SNAKES on PLANES" simply said. If it is tongue in cheek and does not try to be over the top serious or dramatic, I think I cna stomach my way through it and enjoy it.

2006-07-13 12:00:46 · answer #7 · answered by Wheels 5 · 0 0

haha it makes me laugh...and i was watchin this news thing on t.v. and they were talking about finding mice on a plain and i was like "that would make a better movie than snakes on a plain"! hollywood is just running out of movie ideas...everything is either made out of a book and/or has a sequal, and the original ideas just suck!

2006-07-13 11:32:29 · answer #8 · answered by A Pirate's Life For ME ;) 6 · 0 0

ya, even the name is stupid.
"Snakes on a Plane" wow, sounds interesting and scary, NOT

2006-07-13 11:30:42 · answer #9 · answered by . 2 · 0 0

Yes, it's going to be stupid. But it has Samuel Jackson in it so I'll go see it anyway.

It's going to be one of those films that's good because it's stupid.

2006-07-13 12:25:28 · answer #10 · answered by Z, unnecessary letter 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers