.Do you know who the jews really are? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.
2006-07-13
11:11:58
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Biomimetik
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now.
These are the people who became what we call Jews..
There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land
2006-07-13
11:12:20 ·
update #1
Read On: D Dunlop
1. The History of the Jewish Khazars. New York: Schocken Books, 1967.
2. "The Khazars." The Dark Ages: Jews in Christian Europe, 711-1096. 1966.
2006-07-13
11:17:22 ·
update #2
THATS SO TRUE!!! I'M A POLISH JEW AND I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT!!!!
2006-07-13 11:15:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Actually...
The Khazars were important allies of the Byzantine Empire against the Sassanid empire, and were a major regional power at their height. They fought a series of successful wars against the Arab Caliphates, probably preventing an Arab invasion of Eastern Europe. By the end of the tenth century, their power was broken by the Kievan Rus, and the Khazars largely disappeared from history. The theoretical Khazar contribution to the bloodline of modern Ashkenazi Jews proposed by some historians is politically sensitive. Current genetic studies show that Jewish Y-Chromosome DNA seems to have originated in Middle Eastern populations, whereas studies which take into account Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) show no relation to middle eastern ethnic groups. So although Khazars might have been absorbed into the Jewish population it is unlikely that they formed a large percentage of the ancestors of modern Ashkenazim.
Some historians have looked for possible connections between the Khazars and the lost tribes of Israel, but modern scholars generally consider them to be Turks who migrated from the East. Scholars in the former USSR considered the Khazars to be an indigenous people of the North Caucasus. Some scholars, such as D.M. Dunlop, considered the Khazars to be connected with a Tiele confederation tribe called He'san in Chinese sources from the 7th-century (Suishu, 84). However, the Khazar language appears to have been an Oghuric tongue, similar to that spoken by the early Bulgars. Therefore, a Hunnish origin has also been postulated. Since the Turkic peoples were never ethnically homogenous, these ideas need not be deemed mutually exclusive. It is likely that the Khazar nation was made up of tribes from various ethnic backgrounds, as steppe nations traditionally absorbed those they conquered.
Clearly, it says that they probably form a small percentage of Ashkenazi jews, which themselves make up about 90% of modern day Jewry. They were also allied with the Byzantine empire. You are quite correct though, in that they had a large area of southern Russia and Ukraine, under their thumb either via direct rule or through influence. Apparently, their ferocity is exxagerated as it is not so played up in the Wikipedia article I obtained this other information.
2006-07-13 11:23:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by TwilightWalker97 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Twilightwalk answered with solid information and the following may add some to her efforts.
“Khazars (khä′ zärz), ancient Turkic people who appeared in Transcaucasia in the 2d cent. A.D. and subsequently settled in the lower Volga region. They emerged as a force in the 7th cent. and rose to great power. The Khazar empire extended (8th–10th cent.) from the northern shores of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea to the Urals and as far westward as Kiev. Itil, the Khazar capital in the Volga delta, was a great commercial center. The Khazars conquered the Volga Bulgars and the Crimea, levied tribute from the eastern Slavs, and warred with the Arabs, Persians, and Armenians. Religious tolerance was complete in the Khazar empire, which reached a relatively high degree of civilization. In the 8th cent. the Khazar nobility embraced Judaism, and Cyril and Methodius made some Christian converts among them in the 9th cent. In the 10th cent. the Khazars entered into friendly relations with the Byzantine Empire, which attempted to use them in the struggle against the Arabs. The Khazar empire fell when Sviatoslav, duke of Kiev, defeated its army in 965. The Khazars (or Chazars) are believed by some to have been the ancestors of many East European Jews.”
Biomimetik’s question addresses an interesting historical corundum of the genetic impact of the Khazars (or Chazars) on the peoples of East Europe in general and the Jewish people specifically. However, to make this question in the structure of, “Do You Know Who Are The Pigs And Apes, phallic and Tyrants worshipers, the scum of the earth” exhibits a point of view that rests on innuendo, rumor, and bias statements, rather than opine from a factual foundation. It does nothing to enhance the dialog.
So too with comments of byderule in the effort to mix some phallic concepts with the gods of Egypt and with Satanism, replacing what is primarily Celtic and Saxon religious culture and this too contribute little if anything to the dialog.
2006-07-13 13:51:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Randy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
extra valuable at what killing, pilfering, and burning books. The nazis were a those who did not know what they needed to do or who they needed to be. they didn't wish anybody to carry close some thing because they knew that they were not the superior people. in actuality they decreased in length the brightest scientists in the international to create yet another race of people who should be so say superior to everybody else. This failed because they could not hit upon a extra dominant gene than that of the folk they hated the most i'm not conversing of the Jews because in actuality they are of an same as that of old. Nazis were wanna be leaders without type of authority. that's why they could not and did not very last. They divided and conquered a lot and had no regret for whom they destroyed. So it is your Barbarians that you could search for suggestion from and in no way the midsection easterns because they were sufferers of the nazis besides. So go figure.
2016-11-02 00:25:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Phallic Worshippers
2016-11-07 09:06:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, you are a moron. You need to go to school and read history books instead of reading Yahoo Answers. I am not a Jew but I don't think they are war mongers. Who cares what happened 2000 years ago?
Arab Muslims are today's war tribes. You must be an Muslim since they are the only people on the Earth who hate Jewish people so much.
Israel is far more powerful than all the Arab Muslim countries put together. You'd better pray to Allah that the Israeli military doesn't come to your country.
2006-07-13 11:20:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Idunno 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
the modern day phallic worshippers are the Christians
this is what the Xmas tree is
it is a left over of tree of life ,a Satanic religion and the tree worship which was symbolic of the phallic worship of the golden penis of Horus ,
after he was cut up and his sister found all the pieces and put him back together again,exept for his penis ,so she made a golden one ,which was worshipped by Pagan cults ,they continued this when they went through a transition from Paganism to Christanity
the naughty Christians have unbeknowing worshipped this penis of Horus eversince.
the rest of your history seems a little screwed up ,but then i am no expert as you profess to be.
2006-07-13 11:25:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have some serious issues man! There is a lot of hate and anger coming from you. I just have to wonder how you feel about those radical Islamists? Just curious as you seem to already have your mind made up in advance as made obvious by your question.
2006-07-13 17:55:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this for real?
Now why don't you tell us the whole truth. Tell us that the majority if modern Jews are NOT descended from these particular Jews.
2006-07-13 11:15:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know what? You are a stupid idiot. What you say is just stupid. Read or listen to something other than The Nazi Gazzette and the Hitler Radio Show and you might actually learn something about history and politics.
2006-07-13 12:48:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by drchicago0 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
whats your point. throughout history land has changed hands, as well as culture and religion. My Scandanavian Ancestors used to go to war because they believed if they died in battle they went to Vallahalla, (heaven) Egyptians used to live life for death, The people in France used to be called Gauls, until Julius Caeser conquered Gaul. you have no point.
2006-07-13 11:17:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by NNY 6
·
0⤊
0⤋