English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i have read that it is the largest user in a home next to your ac/heating unit

2006-07-13 10:53:23 · 7 answers · asked by bootsiece 1 in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

7 answers

No home computer will draw more than half a kilowatt, and most will draw much less.

Considering most shut down at least partially whent the computer is just idling (video off, hard drive off, sections of the CPU turned off or slowed down), it's not that bad.

I would say it compares to 2 100Watt incandescents bulbs. At 10 cents a khw, that would be about $15/month.

I have an AMD box running about the same speed as a Celeron box next to it, and it seems to crank out twice as much heat. One day, I will get a power meter and stick it on these things...

2006-07-13 11:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by sheeple_rancher 5 · 0 0

Your desktop is probably about 200 watts and your monitor is about 100. Just maybe, the total is 300 when used, by turning off the monitor, it is less.

Here is a website with appliance wattage
http://home.howstuffworks.com/emergency-power2.htm

Here is a website of typical cost, but computer is not shown.
http://advisor.lbl.gov/apusage.html

2006-07-13 11:05:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I leave my pc on each and each and every of the time when I’m at living house because I cba to exhibit it off There are various argument no matter if it dose any strong on your pc or no longer As for potential it’s authentic the same as leaving 4 or 5 common mild bulbs on each and each and every of the time on a small pc

2016-11-06 08:30:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Connect an electrical measuring device such as a multi meter to the power cord.

2006-07-13 11:07:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends if you have Intel or AMD processors. Intel uses twice the energy.

2006-07-13 10:56:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A survey was done at Macalaster College. Here are there results. They are highly efficient and surprisingly inexpensive. http://www.macalester.edu/its/faq/power_usage.html

2006-07-13 10:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by maegical 4 · 0 0

Not at all true if you have it to go into standby (energy saver) screen mode and processor.

2006-07-13 10:58:04 · answer #7 · answered by Carla S 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers