Has anyone seen The Davinci Code, and is it worth seeing VS. Reading the book?

Answer 1

The book, hands down. Even if you could give a flying care over a rolling donut about religion and all that, the adventure in the book makes it quite a page turner and hard to put down. It should have made a good movie, but didn't.

Answer 2

Both the movie and the book were uninspiring. Dan Brown fails to deliver much of a thrill, and while the plot can be interesting to some religious people, or people who resent religion, it certainly isn't well delivered. Considering the hype I was very disappointed in the book, and the movie was even worse.

Try nonfiction, the truth is always more interesting than fiction. Da Vinci's biographies, as well as some of his Renaissance contemporaries are compelling to say the least.

Tiger Striped Dog MD

Answer 3

The book is 100 times better than the movie. You have to read the book.

Answer 4

Read the book.... WAY BETTER THAN THE MOVIE. I read the book twice, listened to in on CD twice, and was very mad at the movie. I understand the changes, but Tom Hanks was not Robert Langdon. The book is an easy read, you can do it pretty quickly, in two nights maybe. Especially interesting if you know the artwork being references. Also, Angels and Demons, the prequel book, is cool too.

Answer 5

Like most book to movie deals it's best to read the book first.

They left a lot out of the movie, and took a bunch of stuff out of order.

Answer 6

The book was a real "page turner" for me... very exciting and interesting to read... The movie seemed boring and slow. The book is sooo much better!

Answer 7

Eh, the 1st e book "Angels and Demons" replaced into plenty greater exciting. i think of there replaced into alot of protest over a e book that even claims to be fiction, that's punctiliously stupid. in spite of if the info in stated fictional tale have been genuine, IE that Christ replaced into married and had infants, it may replace somewhat no longer something. The scriptures are thoroughly silent on the undertaking. And there have been needless to say subjects interior the early church the place human beings have been claiming descent from Christ. So its basic to work out why rational human beings ought to have self belief the two way. it is likewise clean why the Catholic Church stamped out the theory that Christ had infants: Charlemagne. They have been legitimately apprehensive that folk could declare descent from Christ and declare divine precise to rule. It replaced into confusing sufficient preserving Europe good on the time because it replaced into, final component they mandatory have been loads of distinctive human beings elevating the declare that they descended from Christ in an attempt to get carry of political capability. the actual certainty is, no count if he replaced into married and had teenagers is punctiliously irrelevent to the Gospel. It does no longer replace the indisputable fact that he's the Son of God. Nor does it replace the indisputable fact that He atoned for the Sins of the earth. Nor does it replace the indisputable fact that He replaced into the single appropriate individual who ever lived. It does no longer replace the indisputable fact that He replaced into the 1st guy to resurrect from the grave. human beings can exercising faith in Christ and repent in spite of no count if He replaced into married or no longer. that is only no longer that considerable.

Answer 8

The movie was just OK. It deviated from the book slightly. I enjoyed the book MUCH better.

Answer 9

The movie is really not what I expected. I suggest not watching it. The book is way better.

Answer 10

for me the book was better than the movie. but i like the movie very well