ww3 would not start with nuclear weapons ...conventional warfare would go first you know warships and airplanes and who ever gets desperate would than launch the nukes.
2006-07-13 11:11:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by gothicirishpeople 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
With all the tension in the world right now, from the mid east, africa, n. Korea and India/pakistan, it appears that we are at the brink of a world war. I don't think nukes will have to be used to call it a world war, but the current "conflict" in the mid east between isreal and lebbanon could be the spark that pushes the tension amoungst these nations over board. Before we know it, every major nation could be involved in some type of conflict/ war. That's what world war is.
2006-07-13 18:02:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by INS 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good GOD...it sure the HELL seems like it, and it's always the middle east (and African continent). F--KING tragic. Maybe it would be best for the earth and rebirth if the Big 5 all dropped their nuclear bombs together. Humans--so selfish, so evil, so many.
2006-07-13 17:47:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by chance 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! It would be on the news!
2006-07-13 17:45:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by joe b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it appears to have started, the beginning event is the hezbollah's attack on Israel
2006-07-16 03:35:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When we start seeing bright flashes and mushroom clouds then we know when WW3 starts.
2006-07-13 17:48:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the first one to launch the nuclear bomb
2006-07-13 17:44:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by grateful6979 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not yet but soon...and that will kick the ultimate war ARMAGEDDON!!!!!!
2006-07-13 17:45:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by King S.P.A.W.N. 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it hasn't started
believe me if it started u would knw
2006-07-13 17:44:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Thewall 3
·
0⤊
0⤋