2006-07-13 10:39:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
6
2006-07-13 10:43:03 · answer #1 · answered by MDPeterson42 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
2
2006-07-13 23:04:42 · answer #2 · answered by Professor Armitage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3
2006-07-13 20:55:07 · answer #3 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
10
2006-07-13 17:42:29 · answer #4 · answered by Mox Nix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends on the homo sapiens being a man =..0002; or a woman = 100. hahaha Just kidding here.
How can you measure evolution? You can´t. You can´t say you are a little evolved. It´s like being a little pregnant.
Everything from amoebas to humans are always evolving, but the big changes resulting from evolution can only be seen after millions of years.
2006-07-13 18:49:37 · answer #5 · answered by Ambar4me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really, you're asking the wrong question.
Evolution is not about trying to achieve a goal such as omniscience (or even intelligence). Species have succeeded because they are well adapted to their environment, and their likelihood of continuing to succeed depends on how adaptable they are to changes threatening that environment.
By that definition, it's very difficult to make a scale. Humans are very well adapted to their environments and very adaptable to environmental change (since we can change our own environment) - so I'd go for 90/100 on an adaptability (evolution) scale.
But compared to the humble cockroach - 100/100. Can't see much sending those extinct!
2006-07-13 18:35:30 · answer #6 · answered by the last ninja 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
about a 15.
2006-07-13 17:46:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
About a 6 overall.
Here's the breakdown:
Social evolution: 5
Physical evolution: 12
Intellectual evolution: 3
Throw in a little weighting and you get a score of 6. Humans have a long way to go before being god-like.
2006-07-13 17:54:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if that is the scale id have to say that we are about a 1.00000000000000000001. because omniscent is a term usually used to discribe god. a non proven being that is supposedly perfect and all powerful. so we would have to evolve to the point where we had esp befor we could even be called a 2.
2006-07-13 17:44:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlucky 13.
2006-07-13 17:43:56 · answer #10 · answered by Tim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋