If the Warriors could deal Baron Davis and another player for another high profile player, should Chris Mullin do it?
2006-07-13 10:26:56 · 11 answers · asked by Tiger Fan 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Their team won't be better if they trade Baron Davis in the summer, but I think in the long run it's better for the Warriors (cost and injury prone). At this moment no one would take the risk and trade for Baron as he is injury prone and injuried as the season ended. If any trade was to occur it would likely be in the midseason after Baron has shown he can still fill the stat sheet. But yes, I think they should trade Baron away. It would open more time for Monta Ellis and relieve the Warriors of his expensive contract.
2006-07-13 10:52:58 · answer #1 · answered by StickMaN-X 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO!! Thats a dumb question to ask. Baron Davis is one of the top 6 point guards in the league, being number 6. With him being healthy and Jason Richardson too. That makes them the two most dangerous guards in the league. Think about it, they both bring toughness. Mullin was smart enough to bring Davis. They would be better off trading away Troy Murphy for Al Harrington. Murphy is a sad player. He can do better than what he does. Had a great sophmore year but then went down.
2006-07-13 12:15:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would all depend on the deal. The problem with Baron Davis is that he gets injured so often. When he's playing, however, he really brings a lot to that team. His ability to move the ball and push the offense makes them a much better team.
I think Troy Murphy is more likely to be moved. Murphy's a nice player and a great rebounder, but he doesn't have much of a low post game on offense. They'll likely move him and/or Dunleavy before they move Davis.
2006-07-13 10:55:22 · answer #3 · answered by Philthy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way. Baron Davis is a great and true point guard. They need him and won't do much better without him. Golden State just needs another player who can help them score points besides Jason Richardson and Baron Davis.
2006-07-13 10:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by rogerchang06 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If B-Diddy quite needs to play on the infantrymen as a lot as he reported he does, then there is doubt that he should be decrease back next 12 months taking a settlement like Tim Duncan did with the Spurs, so as that the infantrymen ought to advance their team. Baron's agent continously says baron needs to play as a warrior so we are able to ascertain how that works out. Biedrins and Ellis are a ought to keep. Warriors extra constructive have discovered from their memories with youthful gamers being enable flow. (Arenas etc)
2016-10-14 10:43:06 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way! Look at the season Davis had last year. As long as he stays healthy, him and Jason Richardson are deadly.
2006-07-13 10:28:54 · answer #6 · answered by ekinevel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nah, they should try an trade richardson..he sucks anymore...i would try to get 2 alright guys for richardson..2 guys that are like wally szcerbiak and ricky davis or darius miles..somethin like that..i dont like warriors..lol..so i could care less who they get or anything..wizards all the way..oh an the best player in the NBA, even better than mike...LEBRON JAMES! #23!
2006-07-13 10:32:09 · answer #7 · answered by tcstyles24 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Davis and Richardson are the best together
2006-07-13 13:52:44 · answer #8 · answered by WC 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe. He is dishing out a lot of assists but he isn't helping them one bit by shooting 38% from the floor and 68% from the line.
2006-07-14 05:07:48 · answer #9 · answered by #15mwu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NAH, because they don't have anyone to play the position on thier team that has the talent of B-diddy.
2006-07-13 14:11:05 · answer #10 · answered by Q 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋