Would it be easier to defend a case regarding real property or intellectual property?

Question

Any why????

Answer 1

Real property - the case law is more established.

Answer 2

Intellectual property law is still a little bit fuzzy, other than patent law. I would say that real property would be much easier to defend and to prosecute. However, with the relative "new" feel to IP law, it might be very much easier to prove a case in which there were no other cases to contradict what one was trying to prove.

Answer 3

I would think it would be easier to defend a case regarding real property, though I am not experienced in either. It would just seem easier for me to argue for something, (and make a jury, etc.) understand if there was something tangible to relate to, see, etc. It seems harder to prove intellectual property, at least to me. Especially if someone has (stolen an idea) it would be hard to argue where it originated from.

Answer 4

In real property - there are more cases, a longterm history and - very important - no international matters!

Real property always is a matter of the law at the place the property lies - with intellectual property it might be very difficult.

Answer 5

You didn't give enough information to really answer this question.

Real property is land, and any improvements made upon that land. Intellectual property is the products of one's creative abilities, including musicial compositions, patents, etc.

If you are more specific about what type of case, I can give you a better answer.