People said that he was a better war-time leader than a peace-time leader and so after WWII he lost re-election to Atlee.
I wanted to know what were the main reasons why he lost that election. Also once he finally did get re-elected again, did he prove to be an effective leader during his second term?
Hope my question makes sense but if anyone could explain in their own words, that'd be a big help.
2006-07-13
09:43:01
·
6 answers
·
asked by
poprocks24
3
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History
fifty thanks for the story.....since we are talking about churchill here, I have no problem believing that is a true story.
2006-07-13
10:12:34 ·
update #1