English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Females today act in uncaring, antisocial ways regarding their reproduction; on the open sexual market it neither feels good or bad to engage in giving free or paid for sex. Females encouraged to see mating as a job under the title sex worker have had the emotional rug pulled from underneath them, mating has become a commodity like soap, toothpaste and toilet paper. Importantly, this male reproductive ambush, never registered with females when contraception was first introduced, females experienced the event but the serious knowledge that could have been gained unfortunately passed them by. The HPI concludes that women are no happier, contraception has not made events better; one can only conclude that our successful economic growth has created much social deformity. But does man care to change the economy, not while two of his favourite reproductive tools are selling so well, brothels love condoms and the contraceptive pill, heck man does most of his research in them!

2006-07-13 09:33:18 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

2 answers

The HPI is wrong. Women are living longer and enjoying life more, now that they're not averaging seven children per family.

The scrambled social problems we've got don't arise from contraception, but from women coming out of the exhausted haze of childcare long enough to tell their husbands, "hey, get off your rear and do the laundry!" Which made a lot of men decide to get rid of the wife, 'cos if they were looking for sex without the hassle of childrearing, they'd rather have someone twenty years younger.

2006-07-13 17:26:55 · answer #1 · answered by Elfwreck 6 · 0 1

I'm sure it will all be OK once the women rule the world and I can stay home and be a house father without people calling me a fag.

2006-07-13 16:40:39 · answer #2 · answered by ye_river_xiv 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers