you assume they are facts based on the author but dan brown actually was quoted as saying the book is fiction based on some facts and a lot of imagination. remember assume makes an 'a$$' out of 'u' and 'me'...assume
2006-07-13 09:10:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by hell_in_a_handbasket 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dan Brown (or anyone else that believes this for that matter) has yet to provide any concrete evidence. Everything is circumstantial and coincidental.
I think it's a great book but it is a work of fiction.
2006-07-13 09:10:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elisabeth D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like quite a lot all and distinctive who has already responded: The e book is predominantly a fictive novel. The area i imagine is humorous is how a lot people push that it really is an "evil e book" or that the Bible is "in basic terms as a lot fiction". sturdy grief! once you enable people to edit history you get a "cleanser" version of what got here about. in basic terms study First and second Kings, then analyze with the tone in First and second Chronicles (interior the former testomony). looks to me that the author of Chronicles wanted a more suitable short, cleanser version of activities. And we do an similar project at found in our histories... we idealize George Washington as almost a saint! He replaced right into a guy, made some blunders, made some sturdy judgements AND replaced into VERY UNPOPULAR throughout the time of his second time period as President! yet we "keep in recommendations him" as this demi-god of the Revolution. also... so why won't be able to Christ have married? He by no skill taught everyone it replaced into incorrect. And His Apostles later taught the favor of marriage (one million Cor. 11:11). So, perhaps he replaced into married. What in marriage (a sturdy one) may may decrease his Divinity? not something! for my area, a large marriage brings us in route of a Heavenly state (or Nirvana, or inspite of is the bigger, more suitable useful deal than what we've were given at present). And, if God taught the gospel interior the former international, he in all likelihood did an similar interior the recent international. The Bible refers to a "stick of Judah" and "stick of Ephraim" which could grow to be one of their prophet's hand. If the Bible is that this style of, the position is the different one? I heard some adult males preserving that this replaced into the e book of Mormon, even if the pastor says they don't look to be Christian. a twin of interior the Da Vinci Code, feels like I gotta study and discover out for myself b/c the "authorities" do not look precisely honest. in basic terms my 2 bits... boa sorte!
2016-12-10 09:08:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are no facts in the da vinci code.
2006-07-13 09:10:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Grandma Susie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is stated as fact in that book is really mostly based on myths and local legends. Hardly a solid foundation.
2006-07-13 09:16:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by pax_rock2004 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He shares a lot of longstanding theories but none of them proven.
A suspenseful novel really and some interesting historical facts thrown in.
2006-07-13 09:10:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by lily 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The hidden facts, done by Rome.
2006-07-13 09:10:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by sukhwinder b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe every word, except for the asenine chase story of course. it is entirely believable that there was an ancient conspiracy that has endured until present times.
2006-07-13 09:10:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
very few facts.
2006-07-13 09:09:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
easy. fiction.
2006-07-13 09:09:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by axon3_2001 3
·
0⤊
0⤋