Why put stuff on cars to make them look fast, but they arent faster than a regular cars.? instead of putting real performance parts in the engine to made it really faster? i really dont like all-show , no go cars.
2006-07-13 08:59:27 · 4 answers · asked by ChemaMau 4 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Other - Cars & Transportation
Some tuner cars are in fact hotter than stock, but I agree too much show, not enough go is too common place. I willa dmit to having put a lot of decals on my old Neon, but I used to race and autcross the darn thing, so I felt it was justified. I had only redone the airbox and intakes, so it wasn't ridiculous, and I did not put on any body mods, just some decals. Looking back, I was too cheesy, but it made me happy, so that's what mattered.
2006-07-13 09:10:08 · answer #1 · answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I feel the same way...I like a completely clean stock look with engine mods...I'm just a sleeper kind of guy. I don't get body kits...they crack, paint chips/cracks, fall off...they're a waste of money. For the price of a kit and paint, you could buy a nasty turbo kit.
2006-07-13 09:09:44 · answer #2 · answered by Boom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of them are pathetic, American Muscle is the way to go if you can afford gas. I think it's priceless when people think they gain x ammount of horsepower by putting a bumble bee exhaust on, when they don't understand that manufactureres overrate (severely sometimes) horsepower gain ratings.
2006-07-13 09:15:53 · answer #3 · answered by jonjroberts 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
depends who likes what. all show but no go or no show but alot of go
2006-07-13 09:02:47 · answer #4 · answered by markski037 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋