Would you accept a one-time $100,000 to never...?

Question

...masturbate again. No cheating!

Answer 1

Show me the money!

Answer 2

Your question is very relative. People's answers actually serve as answers to a mix of 2 questions. The first question is the one you asked, and the second is, "How much money do you have?" If someone says they'd take the money, that could either be because masturbating isn't a huge temptation or money is in extremely short supply. You see... I'm a banker. I view $100,000 a lot like I'm sure you view a quarter. If you see one on the ground and you're not too busy, you'll go ahead and pick it up, $50,000 to me is probably more like a nickel or dime for you, where it's almost not even worth the time and energy to bend down and pick it up. I can just go call up a client or close a deal and make a lot more than that in about the same amount of time - it's just kinda like, "Oh there's 50 grand. Hm," and then I walk on by. So I suppose my answer to your question would be no, I wouldn't take the money, because masturbation occasionally proves mildly entertaining, but I'm not sure if I'd take $100,000 to never blow a bubble with bubble gum again because I kind of like the sound it makes when it pops. So I'm not sure how much my answer is really going to mean to you.

Answer 3

Sure.

I'd be lying of course. Haha

I think it's almost humanly impossible to refrain from such self-indulgence for an entire lifetime unless
a) you're very Catholic [as opposed to only somewhat, and still it's quite long shot],
b) you're contented by your everlasting supply of smack,
c) you have no genitals,
d) you have no hands,
e) you're a para/quadriplegic
f) you've found someone who is not only a f*cking amazing f*ck, but also conveniently fits into you pocket, and is always charged and ready to go at a moments notice.

I don't exactly qualify for any of these; however, I'd most definitely be willing to lie to anyone who was daft enough to trust that I was actually capable of such self-restraint. The orgasmic rush of dopamine flooding my brain, when I'm all out of chemical catalysts and lack a partner in crime, well versed in both anatomy and the mind, is worth by far more than anything money can provide. Even so, though $100 000 isn't much, it is worth a little white lie.

Maybe if I somehow managed to acquire a guaranteed-a-stellar-f*ck-for -life f*ck buddy I'd stand more of a chance. LOL, I wish!

Answer 4

For that kind of dough I could boink between 300-500 prostitutes and based on a boink a week that would last between 6-10 years (couple of weeks off here or there). Yeah, I'd take $100k to not masturbate.

Answer 5

Does that include not using toys or other peripheral apparatus?

And what about mutual masturbation? Does that count? =) How about masturbation for scientific research purposes?

Ah, I digress... I guess I'd do it, but I need the money up front. Haha.

Answer 6

Yes

Answer 7

For $100,000 cash (no tax) I would.. can get a lot of pleasure for $100,000 in other ways.

Answer 8

That's not a lot of money. You could spend that in less than a hour. Lets raise the bar there bro.

Answer 9

Sure....why not? Theres still sex......Exept for the people who dont get none! Which I'm guessing includes you, since you even asked this question......And thats not even alot of money....All you have to do is save that money, increaese untill your one rich muthafucker!

Answer 10

well i cannot masturbate but can i do the real thing??? can i quit job with 100000 dollars??? if yes then i would do it...Anything for not having to go to work everyday

Answer 11

Of course. I'd rather pay off debt than to masterbate any day.

Lovely picture by the way.