http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20060713005611&newsLang=en
2006-07-13 08:27:15 · 8 answers · asked by noils 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
She had a lucrative job as a NOC undercover agent in the CIA. Now that that cover has been blown by the defendants and every operation she worked on compromised and every agent she was ever seen with compromised and her life put in danger, she might be justifiably miffed. There is also a lot of money that she cannot now earn due to the inability to practice the trade she trained for, as the result of the actions of the defendants.
I hope she takes them for every cent they have. They should be in Gitmo for their treason.
2006-07-13 08:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Because Fitzgerald won't file charges on Rove and the Vice President
2006-07-13 08:51:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's the choose who replaced into assigned to the case. And from the ruling, he replaced into ultimate as a count of regulation. there have been federal statutes that provided immunity to the administrative.officers named as defendants. study his ruling. He in specific stated that what occurred to her replaced right into a nasty component, and that he replaced into no longer ruling on the advantages of the case. He replaced into in basic terms dealing with the procedural subjects, which required dismissal. I want human beings could end attempting to make this a partisan difficulty. The choose accompanied the regulation because it replaced into surpassed via Congress. and that i want human beings could end bashing judges for following the regulation. The choose isn't the guy who wrote the regulation.
2016-12-10 06:13:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because their actions exposed her identity as a CIA operative. If they can't be held accoutnable criminally, maybe there will be some civil justice.
They're getting a taste of their own medicine.- That is trying to destroy people.
2006-07-13 08:33:34 · answer #4 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because she believes she was defamed. There is a lower threshold in civil court than in criminal court. And - the President cannot pardon a civil judgment.
2006-07-13 08:49:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have to try and save face. Too late!
2006-07-13 08:33:59 · answer #6 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because she's evil.
2006-07-13 08:30:12 · answer #7 · answered by sethle99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the **** you talking?
2006-07-13 08:29:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋