that was the deal, it is happening and ten babies are crying, if you don't do it, they'll be killed.
the dead animal is 3 days fresh, and a giant moose
2006-07-13 07:50:33 · 31 answers · asked by cpt_tho_extreme 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
no.
2006-07-13 07:52:45 · answer #1 · answered by Love My Soldier 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless, I knew the babies personally, this really isn't a hard decision at all. They haven't had time yet to know what they are missing out on, and they wouldn't even be aware of the fact that they are dying. The world is overpopulated anyway, and their parents would probably end up messing them up with their own issues they never had resolved, so heck no I'm not making love to any dead animal. Unless it was a wienie dog of course bc they are dead sexy.
2006-07-13 09:54:43 · answer #2 · answered by cup_o_shina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First you ought to make sparkling what you propose by a "soul". in case you propose something eternal that exists separate to the literal organic and organic existence of the guy and that keeps after lack of life, i do not see why such an entity ought to ought to exist for a creature to mourn the shortcoming of a loved one. in truth, mourning surely makes a lot less experience if a "soul" in this sense exists. in case you propose a understanding and an understanding, then in this sense i imagine this is self obvious that non human animals have this, and also haved the ability to understand its existence in different animals which include people. anybody who has had a puppy cat or canines can see "soul" in this sense in an animal, and word that the animal may also understand the version between a "you" and an "it". that is what makes love a threat, and mourning inevitable, even without the nicely advanced ability for language that people have.
2016-10-14 10:37:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd do it. If I roasted it after thats food for a week. I'd have done a good deed too! Everyones a winner. Except the moose but he was dead anyway.
2006-07-13 08:01:09 · answer #4 · answered by MyStErY wHiTe BoY 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, millions of babies are killed everyday. So I guess making love to a dead animal won't really make a difference.
2006-07-13 07:54:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flush the kids, I'd never make it with Yoko Ono under any circumstances.
Vin
2006-07-13 07:56:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the babies live, can you hurl them at predators? If not, then no... Wait... it's not worth misusing a moose...
2006-07-13 07:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
only 3 days fresh....shoot i would have done it without the babies in the equation!!
2006-07-13 07:54:00 · answer #8 · answered by Devon L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um no, beacuse the babies will go to heaven, I'm not doin that. I'd die for them, but not that. Who thinks of that!?
2006-07-13 07:52:46 · answer #9 · answered by Little Red 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to save the babies yes. hopefully that will never happen though
2006-07-13 08:08:10 · answer #10 · answered by fuel91 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could I at least know what drugs or medication you were on when you came up with this cornball question?
2006-07-13 07:53:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋