2006-07-13 07:09:53 · 11 answers · asked by Jilly 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
That is somewhat of a moot thought, don't you think.
Better in what respects?
If you are speaking simply in enviromental terms, then yes I would agree. But there are many aspects that make up the world, so which one(s) are you speaking of.
Better or worse is a human concept. To ask if it would be better without the human race, well I 'd say no. it would just be what it is.
2006-07-13 07:21:04 · answer #1 · answered by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what is the point in the world existing if the human race doesn't?
2006-07-13 14:15:08 · answer #2 · answered by Prince W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought New Hampshire would be a really nice place if it weren't for the people!
2006-07-13 15:24:25 · answer #3 · answered by Igor Jivatofski 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What she said. I had something similar written but did not word it as well, so go with hers
2006-07-13 15:08:11 · answer #4 · answered by danb135 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, when you get right down to it - we are not very clean, we destroy most everything we lay our hands on and we are constantly fighting.
2006-07-13 15:12:59 · answer #5 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no sins on earth by humans, peaceful and quite
2006-07-13 14:13:46 · answer #6 · answered by tah_london 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. It would be "Original" if humans hadn't F**ked it up.
2006-07-13 14:14:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm...no more pollution, Bush, conflicts, Bush, work, Bush...sounds like a pretty good world to me
2006-07-13 14:14:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, there would be no order. How is that better?
2006-07-13 14:13:10 · answer #9 · answered by Lord_of_Armenia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definetly
2006-07-13 14:13:13 · answer #10 · answered by caver nico 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋