Since one must rent a horse for a trail ride at a stable, can I monopolize them to make a profit?

Question

I have just enough cash on me to rent all of the horses for one afternoon, and why not take the chance to turn a profit by charging the other people who want a trail ride extra?

Answer 1

Sure! Just make sure that you have your liability insurance paid up (and it would be very expensive), because you would now be running a horse buisiness. And don't forget about a business liscence, and taxes. The owner would probably kick you off the place as soon as you started selling rides, and then you would be out your money.

Answer 2

If its anything like the outfitter I work for it wouldn't work out too well. You'd need to, as said before) get your ducks in a row concerning liability insurance (not cheap). Then, if you don't actually have people to ride all those horses and to go out with the riders, we'd keep half your money and start renting out the horses to other people if you didn't cancel in advance.

Answer 3

hahahahahaha go for it. You a very interesting person and i've noticed that a lot of people want to talk to you one on one but you don't have 360 im or email well you might but you don't give them out. I'm sure there are people that gave you there emails and you probably don't email them. Why? well i guess if it doesn't bother you then i guess it's ok. I read your little story that you told the one girl about your mum and your friend you visited, it was an interesting story and i enjoyed reading it. well i guess we'll see if you will contact anyone now, because i know i gave you my email well if not have a good day and i guess i'll talk to you through yahoo answers. : )

Answer 4

Well, the only problem is that there is always a trail guide who would probably not appreciate that you are turning a profit on their business, so you'd have to be discreet. Do your side business hiding behind horses in gangsta fashion, because I hear they drag you behind the horse if they catch you.

Answer 5

this can be a civil count and the police manage crime. they don't usually get enthusiastic about civil disputes. The animal rights agencies manage themes of abuse and forget, and could no longer get enthusiastic about this both. those human beings have criminal guidelines to implement, and intense abuse and forget situations to look into. themes like how your horse is being fed or who's driving him should be worked out between yourselves. you do not have a lot of a criminal foundation for a small claims case both, considering there is of route no settlement and no assembly of the minds as to what's or isn't meant to be happening. by boarding there with no freelance, you're in essence accepting the ability as is, with the alternative of taking it or leaving it. Your failure to remove the pony from the belongings once you found that issues were no longer as you envisioned works hostile to you in case you attempt to sue for damages. And what are the authentic, verifiable damages that ought to nicely be shown in courtroom? Courts call for data of damages. Any horse boarded everywhere can advance quirks and behaviors that should be suitable to something between the staff did, or something yet another boarder did, or maybe something suitable to a distinct horse or to the favourite public at great. If a neighbor's truck backfires and your horse flips out and is injured, you won't be able to sue the barn proprietor or the neighber for it. with no obviously spelled out settlement enumerating what's or isn't to be provided, you've not any criminal foundation for a healthful. From what I collect, the first time she allowed your horse to be ridden, it became with her permission. You expressed your soreness, notwithstanding it isn't sparkling even if you made it sparkling that it became not in any respect to ensue again. Now she has suggested you that someone rode your horse on trails, yet did she also say that she had given permission for that to ensue? heresay from a nil.33 party isn't solid. Is it a threat that whoever rode the pony in simple terms assumed it became ok? there is in simple terms too a lot gray section in all of this, and your surprising decision is to stumble on a sparkling position to board your horse and go away this all in the back of you. As I see it, your in basic terms passable option is to locate yet another facility and flow the pony once a threat. you ought to have obviously demanded that she stop to allow all people to feed or vacation your horse, and that ought to nevertheless be finished in the present day.

Answer 6

most places wont let you "sub-lease." You stand a great chance of being sued for violating agreement contracts set by the owners and the agreement waiver is that if YOU fall off or get hurt that youu took full responsibility not the sub leaser. you will get into a lot of trouble for doing it.

Answer 7

I doubt the stable owner would allow this. And can't you find a real job?