i think any one would have been better than her. she didnt look any thing like a well educated person and mom to a 5 yr old. and any way super man and lois lane had chemisty this couple had none.
2006-07-13 06:43:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by in ur face 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. She seemed too young and immature for the role of Lois Lane. There is no way that she looks like she won a Pulitzers for any article. She was trying to play catch up to the past Lois Lane and she failed miserably.
2006-07-13 07:30:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by tisbedashit 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i thought she was pretty terrible.
also looked waaaaay too young for some ball busting career chick w/a kid. she looked fresh out of college MAYBE
and no i'm not jealous i can certainly appreciate a talented and beautiful woman but i think she was a poor selection for the role.
2006-07-13 06:42:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by dharma_claire 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didnt. She didnt fit the original Lois Lane type.
2006-07-13 06:41:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by surf_jayme 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
She did alright. But she's too DAMN skinny. there is no meat on her bones and that isn't attractive at all. You have to weight at least 110 pounds for me to consider you hot.
2006-07-13 07:15:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Taylor C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't believe she was the mother of a five year old but she certainly looked good.
Her acting wasn't too bad either.
2006-07-13 06:42:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by DannyK 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Excellent rendition.
2006-07-13 06:42:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by robert43041 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
she was hot and played ok i thought, but its hard to play someone like lois lane!!
2006-07-13 07:11:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chance G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bad call, I thought
2006-07-13 06:42:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
she didn't look like the real lois lane, but she tried.
2006-07-13 06:41:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Frances S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋