English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

YES... it is the basis of our legal system.

2006-07-13 04:41:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think, legally, everything is considered equal before the law, provided you are a U.S. citizen. If you aren't, there are provisions about how you are treated. As to how and who are making those decisions about those individuals... I would hope that someone nice and official and with good authority would decide... but I'm not sure if Congress is the right place for that decision. I suppose if the case was brought up in the Supreme Court, then it would be best if they chose (even though they have their own isolated political struggles). All in all, if the Constitution could help out on how we treat illegal and legal immigrants, that would probably be best.

Beyond that, every U.S. citizen is considered equal before the law. Key word: considered. The government and the courts treat high and mighty rich gentlemen and ladies quite differently than poor, modest living folk, and that's just the sick reality of life.

2006-07-13 04:55:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The United States constitution deems all people are equal under the law.

2006-07-13 06:00:22 · answer #3 · answered by solisue 2 · 0 0

Everyone is supposed to be equal before the law, but in practise it doesn't work out that way.

Who is the court more likely to give custody to, the mother or the father if both their situations are equal (income, stability, etc)

Who's testamony is more likely to believed, a repeated convict who has been shown to never lie under oath, or a doctor who is believed by friends to be a pathological liar but who hasn't been diagnosed?

I'm sure if you think about it, you can come up with dozens of other examples.

2006-07-13 04:46:51 · answer #4 · answered by cmriley1 4 · 0 0

Everyone is NOT equal before the law. Nor is everyone intended to be equal. Convicted felons forfeit certain civil (though not human) rights, such as the right to liberty, vote, and (I think) hold public office. Also, minors do not have the same rights (or obligations) as do adults. Non-naturalized legal immigrants have different rights than citizens. Illegal aliens do not have the civil rights of citizens and because they are in violation of the law, they forfeit all but their human rights (as defined by the United Nations).

2006-07-13 04:46:38 · answer #5 · answered by BlahBlahBlah 3 · 0 0

Yes everyone is human an deserves to be treat equally. Unfortunately this is not always the case. People are treated differently for many different reasons any where from the color of their skin to their social standing which is not right. Case in point like the way celebrity are treat compared to an homeless person or even the general public.

2006-07-13 04:44:26 · answer #6 · answered by sweetcountrychick 2 · 0 0

United States has a very powerful legal system and all have to follow the law.

2006-07-13 04:45:22 · answer #7 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0 0

Everyone is equal before the law--even at Gitmo says the Supreme Court.

2006-07-13 04:40:22 · answer #8 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 0 0

Speaking specifically about criminal law: Equality in prosecution\sentencing is IMPPOSIBLE; I repeat- IMPOSSIBLE. In fact, that is specifically what people argue about all of the time; should we use mandatory minimum sentencing vs. case-by-case\mitigating circumstances. No 2 situations are exactly the same, but there has to be some sort of measuring tool to determine where to start with punishment.

In my humble opinion, the real problem comes in prosecution. If you can afford to mount a STRONG defence, you might be able to beat the case, or at least get a good plea bargain. [Rush Limbaugh got to plead out his doctor-shopping case so well that he can even claim he wasn't guilty of a crime, AFTER pleading guilty?!?!?]

As with everything in this country- it is about MONEY: haves vs. have-nots!

2006-07-13 04:54:58 · answer #9 · answered by erni_evilsizer 2 · 0 0

Gosh. it somewhat is an fairly great tale. i ask your self no count if it somewhat is ever advised interior the college gadget. i think of the faculties are little warm beds of budding socialists. you're able to study Ayn Rand's "We The living". a great little novel set interior the U.S. of the 1920s. they had replace, only as we are having now. yet sure, that's precisely the line we are happening. The heads of firms, the leaders of industry, the self made millionaires, the human beings who paintings tricky and pay their own mortgages and shop to deliver their teenagers to college are people who're being denigrated now and are going to could desire to foot the invoice for Obama's vast money grab. they are the backbone of this u . s ., the those that pay the expenditures, the human beings who safeguard themselves and their own. share the wealth! And fairly quickly there will be none. look at Zimbabwe. They did a similar component. Took the components out of the hands of the evil prosperous white human beings. Now look at them. They shared the wealth and now they are ravenous.

2016-12-10 06:05:24 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That's the way it's supposed to be; however, as we saw in the Robert Blake, Michael Jackson and OJ Simpson cases, some people are more equal that others - It all depends on how much equality you can afford to pay for.

2006-07-13 05:28:06 · answer #11 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers