I'm writing a paper on this topic, and would like to know what the public thought.
2006-07-13 04:28:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Will it help his ratings?
2006-07-13 04:45:34 · update #1
Yes, we should get out of Iraq, not one more life is worth what we are doing there, we should have never went there in the first place and we did on false pretense. What will happen they will have an all out civil war and the strong will decide the fate of what kind of government that they want. They are killing each other now as it is so, I don't see any difference if we are there or not other the no more Americans will lose their lives for very little reason.
2006-07-13 04:33:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there would be a civil war and iraq would cease to exist. the kurds would create an independent state in the north creating all kinds of problems for turkey. the shiites in the south would fight the sunnis and iran would likely step in and take what's left, minus tikrit,baghdad and the sunni triangle which don't have any oil anyway
basically you kicked out the only guy who had managed to hold iraq together for 30 years, and now there's a power vacuum because americans don't really have the balls to do the dirty work of establishing this new government and rooting out all the independent elements... so usa is trying to train an iraqi army to do it but even that's not working since they're all iraqis and ultimately loyal to themselves and iraq before the USA
2006-07-13 04:34:26 · answer #2 · answered by NONAME 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be chaos, worse than it already is. If the troops leave all at once, there would be a massive power vaccum and the insurgents would be able to take over a lot of lost ground. If the troops pulled out gradually, and we trained more Iraqis to defend their country, then things might end up a lot better
2006-07-13 04:31:50 · answer #3 · answered by deathbear3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. There would be absolute chaos. Probably genocide of Sunnis and Kurds followed by either a power struggle among Shiites or an invitation to Iran to "merge" the two countries. Can you say hello to New Persia? That would be one big power controlling that much oil and guaranteed hostile to the West (not just the US).
2006-07-13 04:38:22 · answer #4 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it really is achieveable that plaid skinned 2 headed travellers from Venus are hovering over the White living house controlling the authorities with ideas administration spells, in a limiteless Universe some thing is "achieveable". What concerns is what's "likely" or "in all probability" depending on the data insofar as they are typically determined and proven. Bush has seven and a nil.5 years of failed guidelines and many those who believe that he's the worst President in U.S. historic previous, he's desperately searching for some thing, some thing, to that can element even as he receives out of workplace and communicate to a precise constructive fulfillment. in step such as his record thus far i don't think of he's able to that type of Machiavellianism, pulling troops out of Iraq is an significant first step to sending them to Afghanistan the position they ought to were all alongside, some thing the subsequent President, whoever it really is, can ought to do as area of cleansing up Bush's mess. it really is way likelier that he's now reversing himself on such distinct issues, like verbal substitute with Iran, because he's conscious those issues are going to ensue besides and he would not opt to be remembered as inappropriate besides as ineffective.
2016-11-01 23:53:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's too late to pull them. I'd love for the war to be over, but I fear if we leave too soon, it will enrage the people we are trying to help and make them feel abandoned. In turn, I fear they would join the insurgents and then we would eventually end up with a war on American soil. Of course, this is only my opinion, but it worries me that that could happen.
2006-07-13 04:33:00 · answer #6 · answered by blondeqtpie13 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he shouldn't for two reasons. It would create an even worse Vietnam complex in the American psyche and it would give Iraq to the terrorist and/or Iran.
2006-07-13 04:32:22 · answer #7 · answered by phxfet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let the Iraqis kill each other. We should be spending our money fixing our own country.
2006-07-13 04:31:51 · answer #8 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We stay until the Iraqi people tell us to leave.
2006-07-13 04:36:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes ..They Should... They are JUst Making thinGs Worse...!!!!!!
2006-07-13 04:31:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋