English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean if u take out processions against him for he has caused so much blood shed in the world and he has a list for the future too, why did he hav 2 win with a majority?
the world was into utter disgust in havin' him rulin' the roost once agaIN..........

2006-07-13 03:45:07 · 15 answers · asked by songbird** 2 in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

Blood shed? Ever heard of Vietnam?

2006-07-13 03:50:59 · answer #1 · answered by love bn a mom 3 · 0 1

I'm sorry...did you put the words "credibility" and "Bush" in the same sentence?

Please excuse me while I laugh my azz off!

Okay...I'm composed now (haha!)...seriously, I'm no fan of our president.
And while I find his decision to invade Iraq deplorable, I can't really say that he "has caused so much blood shed in the world".
If anything, I feel sorry for the guy.
Here's why:

He's a good ol boy from Texas (or so he says);
He got the silver spoon treatment growing up, went to Yale (majored in History, but appairntly failed to understand mideast politics and that history!), took a powder-puff ride with the Air Guard instead of doing a stint in Viet Nam, got a plush job as governor in Texas.
Then, some evil Washinton boys decided to use Bush as the presidential puppet...and he won.
The real operators in the White House are Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Karl Rove, et al.
These slick politicians know how to manipulate the puppet president
Do you really think Bush was smart enough to make all these decisions by himself?
Seriously - there are some evil people surrounding Bush.
He's really a nice guy...he just has some very evil, wicked people giving him horrible advice.

BTW - if you look at the actual numbers of the 2004 election (see link) the Popular Vote was VERY close.
I don't give a damn about the Electoral Vote...it does not reflect actual, indivdual voters.
The one person/one vote count indicated that America was nearly split 50-50.
But given the fact that Bush wasn't going to be elected to a third term (I shouldn't hold my breath because this administration could easily become a dictatorship), his administration doesn't really care about what the other half thinks.

Okay...enough of my rant.
To answer your question: I don't think very highly of President Bushs' credibility.

2006-07-13 04:01:57 · answer #2 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0 0

George Bush is a manager. He has a good managerial style and is an accomplished institutional leader. For what he really does, he is no different, intentionally so, from the CEOs of major corporations. Indeed, it is a business pattern that he is following. He leads and directs a governmental organization that has various legally-mandated activities. While you are griping about his actions involving the affairs of state and use of military, these are just part of what he does in his office.

As for "blood shed in the world", his actions that have ellicited bloodshed are primarily Iraq and Afghanistan. Where else? Is that the world? Who else is dying from American weapons around the world? Your "utter disgust", as applied to "the world" is something called hyperbole--exaggeration. I don't doubt for a second that many people about the globe have a negative opinion of him. I don't doubt for a second that Bush hasn't made some managerial blunders--but who hasn't? If he were permitted a third term, I have no doubt that he would not be reelected, but it is because of these other blunders that he and those in his political party have done to offend the American electorate. Things like overspending and failing to control illegal immigration. The American electorate may not like what he has done in Iraq, but his term of office is not over. Still, "blood shed around the world"?--get real!

2006-07-13 03:59:23 · answer #3 · answered by Rabbit 7 · 0 0

First off I think more of his credibility than I do of your ability to spell. The left wing and the media have done a pretty darn good job of teaming up to discredit this President. Many have bought it hook, line, and sinker. They are so pissed because Clinton was prosecuted for all of his bull crap, and it wasn't just a $low job.
This President didn't cause any bloodshed. He responded to the attacks on AMERICA and he is also working for peace in the middle east. I just hope and pray and I don't have to fight this fricken war again. If we don't handle it now, we will. Why are people so stupid and blind that they don't see it. Would it be okay if a democridiot responded instead? Like they've done in every other war in our nations history. Get real folks. The pissing moaning and whining is going to cause more blood shed in the future. Mark my words.

2006-07-13 03:59:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush has received more suitable grievance than the distinct president in historic previous. He also has been more suitable accessible than the distinct president. With the internet and each and each and every of the cable tips channels the guy can no longer take a drink of water without the total usa of usa of america information what temperature the water is. George W. Bush ought to need to be remembered for preserving this usa of usa of america take care of after 9/11. very few presidents contained contained in the previous have had to bypass by employing what Bush has. commonly used i imagine of historic previous must be sort to Bush.

2016-11-06 07:49:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"So much blood shed"? Do me a favor and look back at the body counts for other wars.

Bush has plenty of credibility among conservatives who want our country safe from terrorism and believe that the money we work hard to earn should remain primarily with us. Liberals who don't care about our nation's security, who believe the government should collect 100% of what you earn and then take care of you, and who don't have a single idea of their own think Bush doesn't have credibility. I wonder where YOU fall?

2006-07-13 03:52:10 · answer #6 · answered by Neerdowellian 6 · 0 0

30 years from now bush will be in history books for the one that finally took terrorism and america's freedom and fear seriously . There have been numerous attacks on civilians and soldiers and documented intelligence reports of many attacks stopped . If clinton would have done something on the first trade center attack 9/11 would have never happened , or we would have been more prepared and could have stopped it. thank god for bush . Right now it is the "cool" thing to do to bash our leader but after it is all said and done your kids will learn all the facts and he will be known for being a great president who took action in defending our country and even trying to help our neighbors life as good as ours

2006-07-13 03:55:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mr. Bush admits to being drunk until age 40 but he could not bring himself to admit to being an 'alcoholic'. Most drunks are in denial so the first thing they do in recovery is to publicly admit that they are an alcoholic. But Bush didn't take that important step. The alcoholic personality lies to himself and to others. No alcoholic has much credibility, Bush included.

Bush lied about the pre-war intelligence on WMD's and dragged us into a war that killed 2580 G.I.'s, wounder 18,000+ and killed over 50,000 innocent civilians. How much credibility can he have?

2006-07-13 03:57:48 · answer #8 · answered by clayblasdel 1 · 0 0

He never won an election fair and square and our country is in turmoil about it. The rest of the world view us as third world, and war mongering, he squandered the good will that happened after 9/11, in answer to your question, no I do not view him as very credible. His is the most corrupt administration that I have ever seen in my 60 years, Remember Nixon (Watergate) Reagan (Iran/Contra) is in that. But Bush is doing these things to enrich himself and his family, he is keeping the world in turmoil to raise the profits of the oil company's as he and his family are heavily invested in them. He has done nothing for the poor and middle class to ease this burden either.

2006-07-13 03:55:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You know what? If you can't even put a coherent question together, or spell the simplest words correctly, then you have no right to bash our President. Worry about your own people.

2006-07-13 03:49:35 · answer #10 · answered by Grandma Susie 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers