English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How would they be different from supernovae?

2006-07-13 03:27:28 · 2 answers · asked by Axel ∇ 5 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

2 answers

Here are some websites:http://www.eso.org/outreach/eduoff/edu-prog/catchastar/cas-hne.html, http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2003/pr-16-03.html.
A hypernova is a possible explanation for gamma-ray bursts. It can be thought of as a "failed supernova" -- a massive star whose core collapses but which doesn't quite blow itself apart. The idea is that the star's core collapses because it has run out of fuel and can no longer produce enough pressure to withstand gravity. The central part of the star collapses, forming either a neutron star or a black hole. In a supernova the resulting shockwave blows off the outer parts of the star. In the case of a hypernova the shock wave doesn't blow off the outer layers of the star. The material of the outer layers falls onto the central black hole or neutron star converting its gravitational potential energy to heat and radiation. This can result in a much higher luminosity than a supernova. This is why hypernovae were proposed as a possible explanation for gamma-ray bursts. The X-ray afterglow from a gamma-ray burst has been found to be more luminous than a supernova. Whether hypernovae actually exist is still an open question.

2006-07-13 03:51:35 · answer #1 · answered by Eric X 5 · 0 0

Hypernova is an astronomical term whose meaning has been shifting. In the late 1990s, it was used to mean an explosion with energy of over 100 supernovae (1046 Joules). Such explosions were proposed to explain the exceptional brightnesses of gamma ray bursts. More recently, hypernova has been used to refer to an exceptionally large star that collapses at the end of its lifespan (this is known as a collapsar).

No hypernovae of the earlier type have been definitively observed, and the explanation has fallen from favor as it has become clear that gamma ray bursts are beamed into very narrow opening angles of less than 1% of a sphere, so that ordinary supernovae can power them.

In the collapsar model, the core of the star collapses directly into a black hole and two extremely energetic jets of plasma are emitted from its rotational poles at nearly the speed of light. These jets emit intense gamma rays, and are a candidate explanation for gamma ray bursts. In recent years a great deal of observational data on gamma ray bursts significantly increased our understanding of these events, and made clear that the collapsar model produces explosions that differ only in detail from more or less ordinary supernovae. Nevertheless, they continue to sometimes be referred to in the literature as hypernovae.

Since stars sufficiently large to collapse directly into a black hole are quite rare, hypernovae would likewise be rare, if they indeed occur. It has been estimated that a hypernova would occur in our galaxy every 200 million years.

2006-07-13 12:54:42 · answer #2 · answered by Sam 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers