it is a defective contract but i couldnt fully understand it. and it will really help if you include an example... please thank you...
2006-07-13 01:25:36 · 3 answers · asked by Lucile 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
an Unintended contract as i understand it is a valid contract complete with consent, object and cause, and there is no infirmity in the three essential requisites, but the instrument/document/deed of the contract failed to contain or express the true intention of the parties... help me im really confused
2006-07-13 01:37:43 · update #1
It seems that an "Unintended Contract", is one that unintentionally make the lawyers of both parties very rich while everyone tries to straighten it out in court.
2006-07-13 01:46:31 · answer #1 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unintended contract---there's no such thing. Lawyer here. A contract is the direct result of your intent to enter an agreement with another person. It requires that you both agree on something, that the terms be reasonably clear and that the agreement be supported by "consideration" the exchange of value. If there is no intended agreement, i.e., a meeting of the minds, there is no contract.
What are you talking about? You need to supply a lot more detail about what it is you want to know because what you have written here makes not sense to a lawyer. Either you agreed to something or you didn't but you cannot unintentionally enter into a contract by definition.
2006-07-13 08:31:21 · answer #2 · answered by William E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe the unintended contract is one made by an incompetant party, who does NOT fully understand what he is signing. Verify this with a lawyer.
2006-07-13 08:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋